High Court disposed of a criminal miscellaneous petition upon parties entering a compromise at the mediation centre regarding maintenance and marital objections.
Directions to SSP Mansa to look into representation and take appropriate action.
This page shows the compact analysis of this judgement. The full analysis — procedural history, issue-by-issue holdings with ratio and obiter, advocates, and paragraph-level evidence for every claim — is being added to the record in batches and will appear here when this judgement has been through it.
IN THE HIGH COURT OF PUNJAB AND HARYANA AT CHANDIGARH.
Crl. Misc. No.M-35681 of 2018 (O&M) Date of Decision: August 18, 2018
Lakhwinder Singh and another
..........PETITIONER(s).
VERSUS
State of Punjab and others
........RESPONDENT(s).
CORAM:- HON'BLE MR. JUSTICE SURINDER GUPTA
Present: Petitioners in person with Mr. M.K.Sharma, Advocate.
Mr. P.S.Dhaliwal, Advocate for respondent No. 5.
SURINDER GUPTA, J.(Oral)
File has been received from Mediation and Conciliation Centre of this Court, where the parties have entered into compromise, which is taken on record as Annexure CS. As per this compromise, respondent No. 5- father of petitioner No. 2 has no objection to the marriage of petitioners. He has also undertaken not to interfere in the matrimonial life of petitioners or to cause any threat to their life and liberty.
Petitioner No. 1 has also stated that to secure petitioner No. 2, of her maintenance, he will open an account in her name, in which he will deposit `10,000/- or more per month.
In view of this settlement, this petition is disposed of with direction to Senior Superintendent of Police, Mansa to look into the representation and take appropriate action in accordance with law.
August 18, 2018 Jyoti-II
( SURINDER GUPTA ) JUDGE
Whether speaking/reasoned: Yes/No Whether Reportable: Yes/No
Jyoti 2018.08.18 14:50 I attest to the accuracy and authenticity of this document
Lakhwinder Singh and another
State of Punjab and others
Surinder Gupta
As recorded by the court registry
Judgements on the same questions, provisions and authorities, from every court
