Petitioner in Criminal Misc. No. M-33319 of 2017 sought withdrawal of the petition with liberty to approach again after examination of the prosecutrix. The High Court dismissed the petition as withdrawn.
Petition dismissed as withdrawn with liberty to approach again after examination of the prosecutrix.
This page shows the compact analysis of this judgement. The full analysis — procedural history, issue-by-issue holdings with ratio and obiter, advocates, and paragraph-level evidence for every claim — is being added to the record in batches and will appear here when this judgement has been through it.
IN THE HIGH COURT OF PUNJAB AND HARYANA AT CHANDIGARH
Criminal Misc. No.M- 33319 of 2017(O&M) Date of Decision: February 26 , 2018.
Kuldip Singh
...... PETITIONER (s)
Versus
State of Punjab ...... RESPONDENT (s)
CORAM:- HON'BLE MRS.JUSTICE LISA GILL
Present: Mr. Veneet Sharma, Advocate for the petitioner.
Ms. Monika Jalota, DAG, Punjab.
LISA GILL, J.
Learned counsel for the State, on instructions from ASI Rachpal Singh, submits that the prosecutrix in this case is yet to be examined.
Learned counsel for the petitioner, at this stage, seeks to withdraw
this petition with liberty to approach again after the examination of the prosecutrix in this case.
Dismissed as withdrawn with liberty as aforesaid.
February 26 , 2018. ‘om’
Whether speaking/reasoned: Yes/No Whether reportable: Yes/No
Omkar Singh 2018.02.28 17:20 I attest to the accuracy and authenticity of this document Chandigarh
Kuldip Singh
State of Punjab
Lisa Gill
As recorded by the court registry
Judgements on the same questions, provisions and authorities, from every court
