Allowed

Amit Singh v. State of Haryana

Punjab & Haryana HC21 Aug 2018CRM-M/26195/2018

Case brief

AI extract

What is this about?

This is an oral order granting anticipatory bail under Section 438 CrPC to the petitioner. The court accepted the State's submission that custodial interrogation was no longer required and directed bail subject to specific conditions including availability for interrogation and regular bail upon presentation of the challan.

What did the court decide?

Stay on custodial investigation allowed; Respondent directed not to use custody if it causes hardship; Bail granted on four specific conditions.

Amit Singh Vs State of Haryana — Bail and Remand | Punjab & Haryana HC (2018)

¶1

CRM-M-26195-2018

¶2

-1-

¶3

IN THE HIGH COURT OF PUNJAB AND HARYANA AT CHANDIGARH.

¶4

Crl. Misc. No.M-26195 of 2018 (O&M) Date of Decision: August 21, 2018

¶5

Amit Singh

¶6

......PETITIONER(s).

¶7

VERSUS

¶8

State of Haryana

¶9

....RESPONDENT(s).

¶10

CORAM:- HON'BLE MR. JUSTICE SURINDER GUPTA

¶11

Present: Mr. Sudhir Rana, Advocate for the petitioner (s).

¶12

Ms. Dimple Jain, A.A.G, Haryana.

¶13

¶14

SURINDER GUPTA, J.(Oral)

¶15

The present petition has been filed under Section 438 Code of Criminal Procedure for grant of anticipatory bail to the petitioner in case FIR No.113 dated 10.04.2018 registered for the offences punishable under Sections 148, 506, 511 read with Section 149 of Indian Penal Code and 25 and 44 of Arms Act at Police Station Nissing, District Karnal.

¶16

Heard.

¶17

Learned State counsel on instructions from ASI Sultan Singh submits that petitioner has joined the investigation which is still in progress but his custodial interrogation is no more required for the purpose of further investigation.

¶18

In view of submission of learned State counsel but without Jyoti2018.08.21 16:34 expressing any opinion on the merits of the case, this petition is allowed and I attest to the accuracy and authenticity of this document

¶19

CRM-M-26195-2018

¶20

-2-

¶21

the order dated 19.06.2018 is made absolute till the presentation of challan, subject to the following terms:-

¶22

(i) that the petitioner shall make himself available for interrogation by the police as and when required;

¶23

(ii) that the petitioner shall not, directly or indirectly, make any inducement, threat or promise to any person acquainted with the facts of the accusation against him so as to dissuade him from disclosing such facts to the Court or to any police officer;

¶24

(iii) that the petitioner shall not leave India without the prior permission of the Court.

¶25

(iv) that the petitioner will seek regular bail on the presentation of challan in Court.

¶26

August 21, 2018

¶27

( SURINDER GUPTA ) JUDGE

¶28

Jyoti-II

¶29

Whether speaking/reasoned:

¶30

Yes/No

¶31

Whether Reportable:

¶32

Yes/No

¶33

Jyoti 2018.08.21 16:34 I attest to the accuracy and authenticity of this document

Amit Singh v. State of Haryana

Case brief

What is this about?

What did the court decide?

Amit Singh v. State of Haryana

Case brief

What is this about?

What did the court decide?

What the court decided

A compact analysis

Issues for consideration

Statutes considered

Parties & counsel

Coram

Case details

Similar cases

Krishan Kumar Vs State of Haryana

Harpal Singh Vs State of Punjab

Vikas Bibra Vs State of Punjab

Angoori Devi & Anr. Vs Rajinder Pal Singh Sandhu

Surinder and Anr. Vs S L Kansal and Anr.

Sukhpal Kaur and Others Vs State of Punjab and Anr.