This single-page oral order disposed of a writ petition seeking to quash an FIR by declaring the proceedings as infructuous because the case was fixed for prosecution evidence.
This page shows the compact analysis of this judgement. The full analysis — procedural history, issue-by-issue holdings with ratio and obiter, advocates, and paragraph-level evidence for every claim — is being added to the record in batches and will appear here when this judgement has been through it.
265
IN THE HIGH COURT OF PUNJAB AND HARYANA AT CHANDIGARH
CRM-M No.23538 of 2016 Date of decision: 04.09.2018
Kamal Joshi and others
....Petitioners
Versus
State of Punjab and another
....Respondents
CORAM: HON'BLE MR. JUSTICE ARVIND SINGH SANGWAN
Present: None for the petitioners.
Mr. Joginder Pal Ratra, DAG, Punjab.
ARVIND SINGH SANGWAN J. (Oral)
Prayer in this petition is for quashing of FIR No.160 dated 08.09.2007 registered under Sections 420 and 120-B IPC at Police Station Raikot, District Ludhiana Rural.
Status report filed by way of affidavit of Assistant SubInspector, Police Station City Raikot, District Ludhiana (Rural) in the Court is taken on record and as per the report, challan was presented on 11.01.2010, before the Illaqa Magistrate and thereafter, the petitioners remained absent from the Court proceedings upto 2014 and after one of the accused namely Lalit was declared as proclaimed offender, charges were framed on 27.11.2014 and the case is now fixed for prosecution evidence.
In view of the above, this petition is disposed of having been rendered infructuous with liberty to the petitioners to raise all the pleas/defence during the course of trial.
| (ARVIN |
D SINGH SANGWAN) JUDGE |
||
|---|---|---|---|
| 04.09.2018 yakub |
|||
| Whether speaking/rea | soned: | Yes/No | |
| Whether reportable: | Yes/No |
MOHD YAKUB 2018.09.05 09:49 I attest to the accuracy and authenticity of this document High Court, Chandigarh
Kamal Joshi
State of Punjab
Arvind Singh Sangwan
As recorded by the court registry
Judgements on the same questions, provisions and authorities, from every court
