Allowed

Dheeraj Tanwar v. State of Haryana

Punjab & Haryana HC23 Oct 2018CRM-M/23126/2018

Case brief

AI extract

What is this about?

Single judge allowed the petitioner's application for anticipatory bail under Section 438 CrPC, making an interim order absolute subject to standard conditions and staying away from the complainant's house, without commenting on the merits of the case.

What did the court decide?

Application allowed; interim bail order made absolute subject to conditions including staying away from complainant's house.

Dheeraj Tanwar Vs State of Haryana — Bail and Remand | Punjab & Haryana HC (2018)

¶1

-1-

¶2

Crl. Misc. No. M-23126 of 2018 (O&M)

¶3

In the High Court of Punjab and Haryana at Chandigarh

¶4

Crl. Misc. No. M-23126 of 2018 (O&M) Date of Decision: 23.10.2018

Dheeraj Tanwar

......Petitioner

Versus

State of Haryana and another

¶9

.....Respondents

¶10

CORAM: HON'BLE MRS. JUSTICE ANITA CHAUDHRY

¶11

Present: Mr. C.K.Singla, Advocate for the petitioner.

¶12

Ms. Priyanka Sadar, AAG, Haryana

¶13

Mr. Surinder Singh, Advocate for respondent No. 2.

¶14

¶15

ANITA CHAUDHRY, J (ORAL)

¶16

CRM-37218-2018

¶17

Application is allowed for the reasons stated therein.

¶18

Complainant is impleaded as respondent No. 2.

¶19

Amended memo of parties is taken on record.

¶20

CRM-37219-2018

¶21

Application is allowed and Annexure P-12 is taken on record.

¶22

CRM-M-23126-2018

¶23

Through the instant petition, the petitioner is seeking anticipatory bail in case FIR No. 39 dated 9.5.2018, registered under Sections 354-D, 506, 509, 384 IPC (added later on) and Section 66 of IT Act, Police Station Women, Sector 16-A, Faridabad.

¶24

Counsel for the petitioner states that pursuant to the order dated

¶25

GURPREET SINGH 2018.10.23 16:56 I attest to the accuracy and authenticity of this document chandigarh

¶26

-2-

¶27

Crl. Misc. No. M-23126 of 2018 (O&M)

¶28

28.5.2018, passed by this Court, the petitioner has joined the investigation.

¶29

State counsel states that the petitioner has joined the investigation.

¶30

Looking to the circumstances, but without commenting on the merits of the case, the petition is allowed and order dated 28.5.2018 granting interim bail to the petitioner is made absolute subject to the conditions laid down in Section 438 Sub Section 2 Clauses (i)(ii) and (iii) of the Code of Criminal Procedure with the rider that he will stay away from the house of the complainant.

¶31

(ANITA CHAUDHRY) JUDGE

¶32

October 23, 2018 Gurpreet Whether speaking/reasoned : Yes Whether reportable : No

¶33

GURPREET SINGH 2018.10.23 16:56 I attest to the accuracy and authenticity of this document chandigarh

Dheeraj Tanwar v. State of Haryana

Case brief

What is this about?

What did the court decide?

Dheeraj Tanwar v. State of Haryana

Case brief

What is this about?

What did the court decide?

What the court decided

A compact analysis

Issues for consideration

Statutes considered

Parties & counsel

Coram

Case details

Similar cases

Rashid Vs State of Haryana

Mubarik @ Tunda Vs State of Haryana

Vishal Khullar Vs State of Punjab & Anr.

Joginder Vs State of Haryana

Vijay Kumar and Ors. Vs State of Punjab and Anr.

Karaj Singh Vs State of Punjab