The court referred the petitioner to a detailed order passed in a connected matter on the same date and did not pronounce any independent decision.
This page shows the compact analysis of this judgement. The full analysis — procedural history, issue-by-issue holdings with ratio and obiter, advocates, and paragraph-level evidence for every claim — is being added to the record in batches and will appear here when this judgement has been through it.
IN THE HIGH COURT OF PUNJAB AND HARYANA AT CHANDIGARH
CRM No.M-22905 of 2018 (O&M) Date of Decision: July 04, 2018
Vijay
...Petitioner
VERSUS
State of Haryana
...Respondent
CORAM: HON'BLE MR. JUSTICE INDERJIT SINGH
Present: Mr.Vishal Nehra, Advocate for the petitioner.
Mr.Surender Singh, Asstt. Advocate General, Haryana for the respondent-State.
INDERJIT SINGH, J.
For detailed order, see order passed in CRM No.M-22606 of
2018 titled as Neeraj vs. State of Haryana of even date.
July 04, 2018 (INDERJIT SINGH) Vgulati JUDGE Whether speaking/reasoned Yes Whether reportable No
Vineet Gulati 2018.07.05 10:46 I attest to the accuracy and authenticity of this document Chandigarh
Colour shows how this judgement treated each authority
Neeraj vs. State of HaryanaReferred¶13
CRM No.M-22606 of 2018 Neeraj vs. State of Haryana
Vijay
State of Haryana
Inderjit Singh
As recorded by the court registry
Judgements on the same questions, provisions and authorities, from every court
