Petitioner sought regular bail in a murder case arising from political rivalry. The single judge noted the charge of attempted murder and the petitioner's flight from custody before the challan was presented, finding no reason to extend bail.
Petition for grant of bail dismissed with no merit.
This page shows the compact analysis of this judgement. The full analysis — procedural history, issue-by-issue holdings with ratio and obiter, advocates, and paragraph-level evidence for every claim — is being added to the record in batches and will appear here when this judgement has been through it.
CRM-M-2257 of 2018
-1-
IN THE HIGH COURT OF PUNJAB AND HARYANA AT CHANDIGARH
CRM-M-2257 of 2018 Date of Decision: 25.05.2018
Parveen
...Petitioner
VERSUS
State of Haryana ...Respondent
CORAM:- HON'BLE MR. JUSTICE SURINDER GUPTA
Present: Dr. Anmol Rattan Sidhu, Sr. Advocate with Mr. Bijender Dhankar, Advocate for the petitioner.
Mr. Deepak Grewal, DAG, Haryana.
Mr. Arshdeep Bhullar, Advocate for the complainant.
SURINDER GUPTA, J.
The present petition has been filed under Section 439 Code of Criminal Procedure for grant of regular bail to the petitioner in case FIR No.516 dated 03.10.2015 registered for offences punishable under Sections 302, 307, 212, 120-B and 34 of Indian Penal Code (for short, “IPC”) and 25 of the Arms Act at Police Station Ganaur, District Sonipat.
Jitender Kumar 2018.05.29 16:00 I attest to the accuracy and integrity of this document Chandigarh
CRM-M-2257 of 2018 -2-
Ramphal, Sushil @ Sheela, Sunil @ Ullu and Naresh @ Bandri were sitting in bullock-cart on which Surinder Singh alongwith his sons Deepak and Parveen was standing. Surinder Singh exhorted to kill Sajjan Pal at which all the persons fired with their weapons. Sajjan Pal suffered 5-6 bullet injuries and Ram Kumar son of Meer Singh had also suffered bullet injury on the nose. Sajjan Pal fell on the ground and accused ran away from the spot alongwith their weapons. Sajjan Pal was taken to hospital but he died on the way because of gun shot injuries.
Jitender Kumar 2018.05.29 16:00 I attest to the accuracy and integrity of this document Chandigarh
CRM-M-2257 of 2018
-3-
May 25, 2018 jk
( SURINDER GUPTA ) JUDGE
Whether speaking/reasoned:
Yes/No
Whether Reportable:
Jitender Kumar 2018.05.29 16:00 I attest to the accuracy and integrity of this document Chandigarh
Yes/No
2 issues framed by the court
Whether bail should be granted to the petitioner in a case involving murder and armed offense where the challan has been presented and there is a risk of tampering with evidence.
Whether the political rivalry and prolonged absconding justify denying regular bail.
1 provisions across 1 enactments
Parveen
State of Haryana
Surinder Gupta
As recorded by the court registry
Judgements on the same questions, provisions and authorities, from every court
