Petitioner sought permission to withdraw the writ petition. The High Court dismissed the petition as withdrawn.
This page shows the compact analysis of this judgement. The full analysis — procedural history, issue-by-issue holdings with ratio and obiter, advocates, and paragraph-level evidence for every claim — is being added to the record in batches and will appear here when this judgement has been through it.
IN THE HIGH COURT OF PUNJAB AND HARYANA AT CHANDIGARH
CRM-M-21567 of 2018
Date of Decision: 24.08.2018
Shiv Kumar Sharma
...Petitioner
VERSUS
State of Punjab ...Respondent
CORAM:- HON'BLE MR. JUSTICE SURINDER GUPTA
Present: Mr. S.S. Grewal, Advocate for the petitioner.
Mr. Amitoj Singh Dhaliwal, DAG, Punjab.
None for the complainant.
SURINDER GUPTA, J.(Oral)
After arguing for sometime, learned counsel for the petitioner
seeks permission to withdraw the instant petition at this stage.
Dismissed as withdrawn.
( SURINDER GUPTA ) August 24, 2018 JUDGE jk
Whether speaking/reasoned: Yes/No Whether Reportable: Yes/No
JITENDER KUMAR 2018.08.24 16:06 I attest to the accuracy and integrity of this document Chandigarh
Shiv Kumar Sharma
State of Punjab
Surinder Gupta
As recorded by the court registry
Judgements on the same questions, provisions and authorities, from every court
