Allowed

Ashish Sharma v. State of Haryana

Punjab & Haryana HC30 May 2018CRM-M/20571/2018

Case brief

AI extract

What is this about?

The High Court granted regular bail to the petitioner, who was falsely implicated in a murder case where the sole eyewitness did not identify him. The petitioner was released on furnishing a bond and surety subject to standard conditions regarding presence and non-departure.

What did the court decide?

Petitioner released on regular bail on furnishing bond and surety subject to conditions of presence at hearings and non-departure.

Ashish Sharma Vs State of Haryana — Bail and Remand | Punjab & Haryana HC (2018)

¶1

CRM-M-20571 of 2018

¶2

-1-

¶3

IN THE HIGH COURT OF PUNJAB AND HARYANA AT CHANDIGARH.

¶4

CRM-M-20571 of 2018 Date of Decision: 30.05.2018

Ashish Sharma

....Petitioner

VERSUS

State of Haryana ....Respondent

¶9

CORAM:- HON'BLE MR. JUSTICE SURINDER GUPTA

¶10

Present: Mr. Bipan Ghai, Sr. Advocate with Mr. Paras Talwar, Advocate for the petitioner.

¶11

Mr. Amrik Narwal, DAG, Haryana.

¶12

¶13

SURINDER GUPTA, J.(Oral)

¶14

The present petition has been filed under Section 439 Code of Criminal Procedure for grant of regular bail to the petitioner in case FIR No.111 dated 21.09.2017 registered for the offence punishable under Section 304 read with Section 34 of Indian Penal Code (for short, “IPC”) at Police Station Sector 20, Panchkula.

¶15

Heard.

¶16

Deceased-Dayal Kishan was married with Deepa Tiwari daughter of Devi Dutt. This marriage was dissolved by way of decree of divorce. Present FIR was registered on the complaint of Pushpa Devi, mother of the deceased, who has stated in her statement to police that on 20.09.2017 at about 05.00 p.m. she received a call of her daughter-in-law on her mobile asking her to send Dayal Kishan to the park of Sector 19, Panchkula. She sent her son to park and after sometime she came to know that her son was being thrashed by father of Deepa Tiwari, Deepa and her

¶17

Jitender Kumar 2018.05.30 17:51I attest to the accuracy and boss Ashish. She went to the park and found that Devi Dutt, Deepa and authenticity of this document HIGH COURT, CHANDIGARH

¶18

CRM-M-20571 of 2018 -2-

¶19

Ashish were beating Dayal Krishan with helmet, chappal (slippers), kicks and fist blows. She brought her son to house and gave him milk mixed with turmeric. In the morning her son was not feeling comfortable and died. In postmortem report, cause of death has been given as injuries on the person of deceased, which have been described as follows:-

¶20

(i) Abrasion of size 12 cm in length extending from anterior aspect to middle of neck to upper part of left chest wall just above left side breast.

¶21

(ii) Small multiple abrasion measuring 2 cm in length present over right wrist joint.

¶22

(iii) Abrasion of size 5 cm in length present over anterior aspect of left leg.

¶23

Deceased was also having dislocation of right shoulder joint.

¶24

Learned counsel for the petitioner submits that only eyewitness in this case is Pushpa Devi, who had appeared as PW-4, and has not stated about presence of petitioner at the spot at the time of occurrence. Even otherwise, the petitioner is not related to Deepa Tiwari and has been falsely implicated as he was helping in her matrimonial dispute.

¶25

The petitioner was arrested in this case on 21.09.2017. As per allegation in the FIR, he gave kicks and fist blows to deceased. Pushpa Devi while appearing as PW-4 has categorically stated that she had not seen the petitioner at the spot and had not identified him.

¶26

In view of above facts but without expressing any opinion on merits of the case and keeping in view the fact that conclusion of trial will take considerably long time, the present petition is allowed. PetitionerAshish Sharma is ordered to be released on regular bail on furnishing bail

¶27

Jitender Kumar 2018.05.30 17:51 I attest to the accuracy and authenticity of this document HIGH COURT, CHANDIGARH

¶28

CRM-M-20571 of 2018 -3-

¶29

bond and surety bond to the satisfaction of concerned trial Court/Chief Judicial Magistrate/Duty Magistrate, subject to following terms:-

¶30

(a) The petitioner shall comply with the conditions mentioned in Section 437(3) Cr.P.C.

¶31

(b) In the event of his absence on any date of hearing, the benefit of bail allowed to the petitioner shall stand withdrawn. The trial Court shall be competent to cancel his bail bond and surety bond and proceed to procure his presence in accordance with law. In that eventuality the petitioner shall have to apply for bail afresh.

¶32

¶33

May 30, 2018 ( SURINDER GUPTA ) jk JUDGE Whether speaking/reasoned Yes/No Whether reportable Yes/No

¶34

Jitender Kumar 2018.05.30 17:51 I attest to the accuracy and authenticity of this document HIGH COURT, CHANDIGARH

Ashish Sharma v. State of Haryana

Case brief

What is this about?

What did the court decide?

Ashish Sharma v. State of Haryana

Case brief

What is this about?

What did the court decide?

What the court decided

A compact analysis

Issues for consideration

Statutes considered

Parties & counsel

Coram

Case details

Similar cases

Bachan Singh Vs State of Punjab

Raghubir Singh and Anr. Vs Sunil Kumar and Anr.

Mewa Singh Vs Santosh Kaur and Ors.

Malwinder Singh Vs State of Punjab

Sohan Lal Vs Kamlesh & Anr.

Aarif Vs State of Haryana