Petitioners sought relaxation of deadlines. Counsel stated withdrawal. Court allowed withdrawal as petitioners would approach appropriate forum. Order dismissed as withdrawn.
This page shows the compact analysis of this judgement. The full analysis — procedural history, issue-by-issue holdings with ratio and obiter, advocates, and paragraph-level evidence for every claim — is being added to the record in batches and will appear here when this judgement has been through it.
IN THE HIGH COURT OF PUNJAB & HARYANA AT CHANDIGARH
CRM-M No. 20498 of 2018 (O&M) Date of decision : 15.5.2018
Amar Singh and another
................Petitioners
vs.
State of Punjab and others
.................Respondents
Coram: Hon'ble Mr. Justice H. S. Madaan
Present: Mr. Amitabh Tewari, Advocate for the petitioners.
H. S. Madaan, J. (Oral)
Learned counsel for the petitioners states that he be permitted to withdraw the present petition since he would approach the appropriate forum for redressal of the grievances of the petitioners. Allowed.
Dismissed as withdrawn.
( H.S. Madaan ) 15.5.2018 Judge
chugh
Whether speaking / reasoned Yes / No
Whether reportable Yes / No
Banita Chugh 2018.05.15 17:09 I am the author of this document
Amar Singh and another
State of Punjab and others
H. S. Madaan
As recorded by the court registry
Judgements on the same questions, provisions and authorities, from every court
