Allowed

Govind v. State of Haryana

Punjab & Haryana HC28 Aug 2018CRM-M/19885/2018

Case brief

AI extract

What is this about?

The High Court of Punjab and Haryana granted regular bail to the petitioner Govind in a non-bailable offence case involving IPC, IT, and SC/ST Act charges. The petitioner was to be released subject to conditions including furnishing a bond and complying with Section 437(3) Cr.P.C.

What did the court decide?

Petitioner ordered to be released on regular bail by furnishing bail bond and surety bond subject to specified conditions.

Govind Vs State of Haryana — Bail and Remand | Punjab & Haryana HC (2018)

¶1

CRM-M-19885-2018

¶2

-1-

¶3

IN THE HIGH COURT OF PUNJAB AND HARYANA AT CHANDIGARH.

¶4

Crl. Misc. No.M-19885 of 2018 (O&M) Date of Decision: August 28, 2018

¶5

Govind

¶6

..........PETITIONER(s).

¶7

VERSUS

¶8

State of Haryana

¶9

........RESPONDENT(s).

¶10

CORAM:- HON'BLE MR. JUSTICE SURINDER GUPTA

¶11

Present: Mr. Vikram Lakhlan, Advocate for the petitioner (s).

¶12

Mr. Amrik Narwal, D.A.G. Haryana.

¶13

¶14

SURINDER GUPTA, J.(Oral)

¶15

The present petition has been filed under Section 439 Code of Criminal Procedure for grant of regular bail to the petitioner in case FIR No. 26 dated 21.02.2018 registered for the offences punishable under Sections 377, 506, 201 read with Section 34 of Indian Penal Code, 67(A) of Information Technology Act and 3(2)(V) of Scheduled Castes and Scheduled Tribes (Prevention of Atrocities) Act, 1989 at Police Station Loharu, District Bhiwani.

¶16

Heard.

¶17

Learned State counsel on instructions from ASI Raj Pal Singh submits that in the video clip prepared and circulated, the petitioner is not visible. The complainant while appearing as prosecution witness, has not supported its case.

¶18

SACHIN MEHTA 2018.08.28 17:34 I attest to the accuracy and authenticity of this document High Court, Chandigarh

¶19

CRM-M-19885-2018

¶20

-2-

¶21

Keeping in view the above facts but without expressing any opinion on merits of the case, the present petition is allowed. Petitioner Govind is ordered to be released on regular bail on furnishing bail bond and surety bond to the satisfaction of concerned Chief Judicial Magistrate/Duty Magistrate, subject to following terms:-

¶22

a. The petitioner shall comply with the conditions mentioned in Section 437(3) Cr.P.C.

¶23

b. In the event of his absence on any date of hearing, the benefit of bail allowed to the petitioner shall stand withdrawn. The trial Court shall be competent to cancel his bail bond and surety bond and proceed to procure his presence in accordance with law. In that eventuality the petitioner shall have to apply for bail afresh.

¶24

c. He shall not leave the country without prior permission of the Court.

¶25

( SURINDER GUPTA )

¶26

August 28, 2018 JUDGE Sachin M.

¶27

Whether speaking/reasoned: Yes/No Whether Reportable: Yes/No

¶28

SACHIN MEHTA 2018.08.28 17:34 I attest to the accuracy and authenticity of this document High Court, Chandigarh

Govind v. State of Haryana

Case brief

What is this about?

What did the court decide?

Govind v. State of Haryana

Case brief

What is this about?

What did the court decide?

What the court decided

A compact analysis

Issues for consideration

Statutes considered

Parties & counsel

Coram

Case details

Similar cases

Jai Singh Vs State of Punjab and Anr.

Ravinder Singh Vs State of Punjab

Rupinder Kaur Vs State of Punjab

Vikram Kaushik and Ors. Vs Ravinder Sachdeva and Ors.

Nikhil Vs State of Haryana

Yadavinder Singh and Ors. Vs State of Punjab and Anr.