This is a non-reportable order where the court records no separate judgment, referring the petitioner to a detailed order passed in a connected case (Shekhar @ Ram Narain) on the same date.
This page shows the compact analysis of this judgement. The full analysis — procedural history, issue-by-issue holdings with ratio and obiter, advocates, and paragraph-level evidence for every claim — is being added to the record in batches and will appear here when this judgement has been through it.
IN THE HIGH COURT OF PUNJAB AND HARYANA AT CHANDIGARH
CRM No.M-1988 of 2016 (O&M) Date of Decision: July 16, 2018
Ramesh @ Rameshwar @ Ram Dayal
...Petitioner
VERSUS
State of Haryana
...Respondent
CORAM: HON'BLE MR. JUSTICE INDERJIT SINGH
Present: Mr.Gautum Dutt, Advocate for the petitioner. Mr.Sukhdeep Parmar, DAG, Haryana for the respondent-State.
INDERJIT SINGH, J.
For detailed order, see order passed in CRM No.M-44157 of
2015 titled as Shekhar @ Ram Narain vs. State of Haryana of even date.
| July 16, 2018 | (INDERJIT SINGH) |
|---|---|
| Vgulati | JUDGE |
| Whether speaking/reasoned | Yes |
| Whether reportable | No |
Vineet Gulati 2018.07.19 14:08 I attest to the accuracy and authenticity of this document Chandigarh
Colour shows how this judgement treated each authority
Shekhar @ Ram Narain vs. State of HaryanaReferred¶12
CRM No.M-44157 of 2015
Ramesh @ Rameshwar @ Ram Dayal
State of Haryana
INDERJIT SINGH
As recorded by the court registry
Judgements on the same questions, provisions and authorities, from every court
