Ramesh Kumar v. State of Haryana and Anr.
Case brief
What is this about?
COURT OF PUNJAB AND HARYANA AT CHANDIGARH…
COURT OF PUNJAB AND HARYANA AT CHANDIGARH…
This page shows the compact analysis of this judgement. The full analysis — procedural history, issue-by-issue holdings with ratio and obiter, advocates, and paragraph-level evidence for every claim — is being added to the record in batches and will appear here when this judgement has been through it.
IN THE HIGH COURT OF PUNJAB AND HARYANA AT CHANDIGARH
CRM-M No. 19466 of 2016 DATE OF DECISION :- May 22, 2018
H.C. Ramesh Kumar ...Petitioner
Versus
State of Haryana and another ...Respondents
CORAM: HON'BLE MR. JUSTICE H.S. MADAAN
Present :- Mr. Vijay Saini, Advocate for the petitioner.
Mr. Sulinder Kumar, AAG, Haryana.
Learned counsel for the petitioner states that since the
petitioner has been acquitted by the trial Court, therefore, this petition has become infructuous and it be disposed of accordingly. He has placed on file copy of judgment in support of his contention.
The petition is dismissed having become infructuous.
(H.S. MADAAN) JUDGE
May 22, 2018 p.singh Whether speaking/reasoned Yes/No Whether Reportable Yes/No
Parvinder Singh 2018.05.23 14:36 I attest to the accuracy and integrity of this document Chandigarh
H.C. Ramesh Kumar
State of Haryana
H.S. Madaan
As recorded by the court registry
Judgements on the same questions, provisions and authorities, from every court