This single-line order dismisses a petition for want of prosecution because parties failed to appear before the learned Judicial Magistrate to record compromise statements, as per the subordinate court's report.
Petition dismissed for want of prosecution.
This page shows the compact analysis of this judgement. The full analysis — procedural history, issue-by-issue holdings with ratio and obiter, advocates, and paragraph-level evidence for every claim — is being added to the record in batches and will appear here when this judgement has been through it.
IN THE HIGH COURT OF PUNJAB AND HARYANA AT CHANDIGARH
CRM-M-18958 of 2018 Date of Decision:30.08.2018
Sarabjit Singh @ Billa and others
....Petitioners
Versus
State of Punjab and another
....Respondents
CORAM: HON'BLE MR. JUSTICE RAMENDRA JAIN
Present: - None for the petitioners. Mr. Amandeep S. Gill, DAG, Punjab.
RAMENDRA JAIN, J. (ORAL)
As per report bearing No.2 dated 21.07.2018 of learned Judicial Magistrate Ist Class, Amritsar, duly forwarded by learned District and Sessions Judge, Amritsar vide Endst. No.6881R dated 24.07.2018, parties did not appear before him for recording statements with regard to compromise.
In view of above, petition is dismissed for want of prosecution.
| August 30, 2018 | (RAMENDRA JAIN) JUDGE |
|---|---|
| R.S. | |
| Whether speaking/reasoned | Yes/No |
| Whether Reportable | Yes/No |
RAVINDER SINGH 2018.08.31 19:06 I attest to the accuracy and authenticity of this document
Sarabjit Singh @ Billa and others
State of Punjab
Ramendra Jain
As recorded by the court registry
Judgements on the same questions, provisions and authorities, from every court
