Petitioner filed a petition under Section 482 CrPC seeking arrest of accused persons. The court noted that investigation was complete, charges framed, and witnesses examined, holding no further orders were called for.
Petition stands disposed of with no further orders called for.
This page shows the compact analysis of this judgement. The full analysis — procedural history, issue-by-issue holdings with ratio and obiter, advocates, and paragraph-level evidence for every claim — is being added to the record in batches and will appear here when this judgement has been through it.
CRM-M-18307-2017
-1-
IN THE HIGH COURT FOR THE STATES OF PUNJAB AND HARYANA AT CHANDIGARH
CRM-M-18307-2017 Date of Decision: 15.12.2018
Surjeeto Bai
...Petitioner
Versus
State of Punjab and others
...Respondents
CORAM:- HON'BLE MS. JUSTICE JAISHREE THAKUR
Present:None for the petitioner.
Ms. Rajni Gupta, Sr. DAG, Punjab. Mr. J.S. Warring, Advocate, for respondents-Piara Singh and Paramjit Kaur.
JAISHREE THAKUR, J. (ORAL)
This petition has been filed by the petitioner under Section 482 of the Code of Criminal Procedure seeking issuance of directions to respondent Nos. 2 to 7 to arrest the accused persons in case FIR No. 33 dated 30.03.2017 under Sections 302, 149 IPC, registered at Police Station Sadar Fazilka, District Fazilka.
Pursuant to the notice, reply/status report has been filed on behalf of the official respondents. As per the status report, the matter was investigated after the registration of the FIR, the accused Paramjit Kaur mentioned in the FIR was arrested on 14.04.2017 whereas other accused, namely, Bhagwan Singh, Harbans Singh @
SATYAWAN 2018.12.17 17:54 I attest to the accuracy and integrity of this document
CRM-M-18307-2017
-2-
Harmesh, Indro Bai were arrested on 15.04.2017.
Learned counsel for the respondent State, on instructions from ASI Harmit Lal, also submits that challan was presented against four persons and thereafter the 5th accused was arrested and the challan has been put up against him as well and two prosecution witnesses have been examined .
In view of the fact that the investigation is complete, charges have been framed and two prosecution witnesses have been examined, no further orders are called for in this case.
Petition stands disposed of.
15.12.2018 (JAISHREE THAKUR) Satyawan JUDGE Whether speaking/reasoned Yes. Whether reportable No.
SATYAWAN 2018.12.17 17:54 I attest to the accuracy and integrity of this document
1 issue framed by the court
Whether further orders are required in a criminal petition under Section 482 CrPC where investigation is complete, charges are framed, and prosecution witnesses are examined.
1 provisions across 1 enactments
Surjeeto Bai
State of Punjab
Paramjit Kaur
JAISHREE THAKUR
As recorded by the court registry
Judgements on the same questions, provisions and authorities, from every court
