The petitioner sought withdrawal of anorder declaring her Special Leave Petition infructuous after a Section 156(3) Cr.P.C. order. The court dismissed the petition as withdrawn.
This page shows the compact analysis of this judgement. The full analysis — procedural history, issue-by-issue holdings with ratio and obiter, advocates, and paragraph-level evidence for every claim — is being added to the record in batches and will appear here when this judgement has been through it.
IN THE HIGH COURT OF PUNJAB AND HARYANA AT CHANDIGARH.
Crl. Misc. No.M-16420 of 2018 (O&M) Date of Decision: August 13, 2018
Sukhvir Kaur @ Sonia
..........PETITIONER
VERSUS
State of Punjab
........RESPONDENT
CORAM:- HON'BLE MR. JUSTICE SURINDER GUPTA
Present: Mr. Chandan Singh Rana, Advocate for the petitioner (s).
SURINDER GUPTA, J.(Oral)
Learned counsel for the petitioner submits that order on the application under Section 156 (3) Cr.P.C. has been passed by the learned Magistrate, as such, this petition has become infructuous and seeks permission to withdraw the same.
Dismissed as withdrawn.
( SURINDER GUPTA ) August 13, 2018 JUDGE Jyoti-II Whether speaking/reasoned: Yes/No Whether Reportable: Yes/No
Jyoti 2018.08.14 10:29 I attest to the accuracy and authenticity of this document
Sukhvir Kaur @ Sonia
State of Punjab
SURINDER GUPTA
As recorded by the court registry
Judgements on the same questions, provisions and authorities, from every court
