Allowed

Ashok v. State of Haryana

Punjab & Haryana HC24 Apr 2018CRM-M/15596/2018

Case brief

AI extract

What is this about?

In a bail petition under Sections 365, 328, 376, 506, 34 IPC for alleged abduction, the Court granted bail pending trial. The Court observed that keeping the petitioner incarcerated served no useful purpose and clarified that observations do not pre-judge the merits.

What did the court decide?

Petitioner released on bail pending trial subject to furnishing bail bonds and surety and compliance with a non-contact order.

Ashok Vs State of Haryana — Bail and Remand | Punjab & Haryana HC (2018)

¶1

IN THE HIGH COURT OF PUNJAB AND HARYNA AT CHANDIGARH

¶2

CRM-M-15596-2018 Date of decision: 24.04.2018

Ashok

... Petitioner

State of Haryana

... Respondent

CORAM: HON'BLE MRS. JUSTICE LISA GILL

¶9

Present: Mr. R.K.Girdhwal, Advocate for the petitioner.

¶10

Mr. Ramesh Kumar, AAG, Haryana.

¶11

¶12

Lisa Gill, J. (Oral)

¶13

The petitioner prays for bail pending trial in FIR No.98 dated 29.04.2017 under Section 365, 328, 376, 506, 34 IPC registered at Police Station Line Paar Bahadurgarh, District Jhajjar.

¶14

Learned counsel for the petitioner submits that the petitioner, who is a tenant of the alleged victim and her husband, has been falsely implicated in this case. As per the allegations in the FIR, the victim i.e. the mother of the complainant went missing on 19.04.2017. FIR in question was registered on 29.04.2017 after an unexplained delay of ten days. The victim herself appeared before the authorities on 22.05.2017 and her statement under Section 164 Cr.PC was recorded on 23.05.2017 (Annexure P-3). The alleged victim has deposed before the learned trial Court and she was declared hostile. Copy of her deposition is attached as Annexure P-4 with the petition. It is, thus, prayed that this petition be allowed.

¶15

Heard learned counsel for the parties.

¶16

Learned counsel for the State, on instructions, from ASI

¶17

Surender Kumar does not deny the factual position that FIR was lodged on

¶18

Sonia Bura 2018.04.25 13:46 I attest to the accuracy and integrity of this document chandigarh

¶19

CRM-M-15596-2018

¶20

-2-

¶21

29.04.2017 for abduction of the complainant's mother on 19.04.2017. He further submits that the statement of the victim under Section 164 Cr.PC as well as her deposition before the trial Court are matter of record. There is no allegation that the petitioner is likely to abscond or not be available to face trial. Trial in this case is not likely to conclude in the near future.

¶22

No useful purpose shall be served by keeping the petitioner incarcerated any longer. Keeping in view the facts and circumstances noted above but without expressing any opinion on the merits of the case, it is considered just and expedient to allow this petition.

¶23

Consequently, the petitioner be released on bail pending trial subject to his furnishing requisite bail bonds and surety to the satisfaction of the learned trial Court.

¶24

It is, however, clarified that the petitioner shall not try to contact the complainant/victim or any of her family member in any manner – directly or indirectly. Any such infraction on the part of the petitioner may entail cancellation of his bail.

¶25

It is reiterated that none of the observations made herein above are a reflection on the merits of the case and shall have no bearing on the trial.

¶26

24.04.2018 (LISA GILL) sonia JUDGE

¶27

Whether speaking/non-speaking? Yes/No Whether reportable? Yes/No

¶28

Sonia Bura 2018.04.25 13:46 I attest to the accuracy and integrity of this document chandigarh

Ashok v. State of Haryana

Case brief

What is this about?

What did the court decide?

Ashok v. State of Haryana

Case brief

What is this about?

What did the court decide?

What the court decided

A compact analysis

Issues for consideration

Parties & counsel

Coram

Case details

Similar cases

National Insurance Company Ltd. Vs Neha and Others

Nirmal Kumar Vs Sarvjit Singh & Ors.

Jitender Nath Sharma Vs Sarvjit Singh and Anr.

Rahul @ Satbir Vs State of Haryana

Atul Soni Vs Saakshi and Ors.

Gurvinder Singh and Anr. Vs State of Punjab and Ors.