2-line order to be read in conjunction with Criminal Misc. No. M-10636 of 2018. No substantive reasoning provided in this text.
This page shows the compact analysis of this judgement. The full analysis — procedural history, issue-by-issue holdings with ratio and obiter, advocates, and paragraph-level evidence for every claim — is being added to the record in batches and will appear here when this judgement has been through it.
IN THE HIGH COURT OF PUNJAB AND HARYANA AT CHANDIGARH.
Crl. Misc. No.M-14861 of 2018 (O&M)
Date of Decision: September 21, 2018.
Jag Mohan
..........PETITIONER(s).
VERSUS
State of Haryana
........RESPONDENT(s).
CORAM:- HON'BLE MR. JUSTICE SURINDER GUPTA
Present: Mr. R.S. Malik, Advocate for the petitioner.
Mr. Amrik Narwal, D.A.G. Haryana.
SURINDER GUPTA, J.(Oral)
For orders, see Criminal Misc. No.M-10636 of 2018 (Vijay Vs.
State of Haryana).
( SURINDER GUPTA ) September 21, 2018 JUDGE Sachin M. Whether speaking/reasoned: Yes/No Whether Reportable: Yes/No
SACHIN MEHTA 2018.09.24 17:19 I attest to the accuracy and authenticity of this document HIGH COURT, CHANDIGARH
JAG MOHAN
STATE OF HARYANA
SURINDER GUPTA
As recorded by the court registry
Judgements on the same questions, provisions and authorities, from every court
