Allowed
Ranjeet v. State of Haryana
Punjab & Haryana HCCRM-M/13302/2018
Case brief
from the order text
What is this about?
Court of Punjab and Haryana at Chandigarh…
What the court decided
AI extract
Court of Punjab and Haryana at Chandigarh…
This page shows the compact analysis of this judgement. The full analysis — procedural history, issue-by-issue holdings with ratio and obiter, advocates, and paragraph-level evidence for every claim — is being added to the record in batches and will appear here when this judgement has been through it.
In the High Court of Punjab and Haryana at Chandigarh
Criminal Misc. No.M-13302 of 2018
.....
Date of decision:2.8.2018
Ranjeet
.....Petitioner
v.
State of Haryana
.....Respondent
Coram: Hon'ble Mr. Justice Inderjit Singh
.....
Present: Mr. Pawan Kumar Hooda, Advocate for the petitioner.
Mr. Sukhdeep Parmar, Deputy Advocate General, Haryana for the respondent-State.
Inderjit Singh, J.
The criminal miscellaneous petition is allowed. For reasons, see separate detailed order passed today in Criminal Misc. No.M-9756 of 2018, Kunti v. State of Haryana.
August 2, 2018. (Inderjit Singh) Judge hsp NOTE: Whether speaking/reasoned: Yes Whether reportable: No
Harpal Singh Parmar 2018.08.03 17:13 I attest to the accuracy and authenticity of this document Chandigarh
Ranjeet
State of Haryana
Inderjit Singh
As recorded by the court registry
Judgements on the same questions, provisions and authorities, from every court