Ajay Sharma v. State of Punjab
Case brief
What is this about?
THE HIGH COURT OF PUNJAB AND HARYANA AT…
THE HIGH COURT OF PUNJAB AND HARYANA AT…
This page shows the compact analysis of this judgement. The full analysis — procedural history, issue-by-issue holdings with ratio and obiter, advocates, and paragraph-level evidence for every claim — is being added to the record in batches and will appear here when this judgement has been through it.
CRM-M-12472-2018
-1-
IN THE HIGH COURT OF PUNJAB AND HARYANA AT CHANDIGARH
CRM-M-12472 of 2018 Date of Decision: 16.08.2018
Ajay Sharma ...Petitioner
VERSUS
State of Punjab ...Respondent
CORAM:- HON'BLE MR. JUSTICE SURINDER GUPTA
Present: Mr. Anant Moudgil, Advocate for the petitioner.
Mr. Amitoj Singh Dhaliwal, DAG, Punjab.
SURINDER GUPTA, J.(Oral)
Learned counsel for the petitioner seeks permission to withdraw the instant petition with liberty to file fresh one.
Learned State counsel opposes submission of learned counsel for the petitioner with the plea that despite grant of interim bail to petitioner vide order dated 10.05.2018 with direction to surrender before investigating officer, he has not joined the investigation so far.
Vide order dated 10.05.2018, it was specifically ordered that in the event of petitioner's not surrendering before the police within two weeks, interim relief allowed to him in this petition shall stand withdrawn and investigating officer will be at liberty to take him into custody.
Admittedly, the petitioner has not surrendered before the Investigating Officer so far and has not complied with the order dated 26.03.2018 and 10.05.2018.
SACHIN MEHTA 2018.08.17 14:09 I attest to the accuracy and authenticity of this document HIGH COURT, CHANDIGARH
CRM-M-12472-2018
-2-
Learned counsel for the petitioner has no explanation for the non-joining of investigation by the petitioner.
All the above facts are taken on record.
Request of learned counsel for the petitioner seeking withdrawal of the petition is allowed.
Dismissed as withdrawn.
Petitioner may file fresh petition, if so desired, which will be considered after looking into the facts recorded above.
August 16, 2018 jk/Sachin M.
( SURINDER GUPTA ) JUDGE
Whether speaking/reasoned: Yes/No Whether Reportable: Yes/No
SACHIN MEHTA 2018.08.17 14:09 I attest to the accuracy and authenticity of this document HIGH COURT, CHANDIGARH
Ajay Sharma
State of Punjab
SURINDER GUPTA
As recorded by the court registry
Judgements on the same questions, provisions and authorities, from every court