The Court made the interim anticipatory bail of the petitioner absolute after conferring that he has joined the investigation and is not required for further police investigation.
The interim anticipatory bail granted on 4.4.2018 was made absolute subject to conditions under Section 438(2) Cr.P.C.
This page shows the compact analysis of this judgement. The full analysis — procedural history, issue-by-issue holdings with ratio and obiter, advocates, and paragraph-level evidence for every claim — is being added to the record in batches and will appear here when this judgement has been through it.
IN THE HIGH COURT OF PUNJAB AND HARYANA AT CHANDIGARH
CRM-M No. 11359 of 2018 DATE OF DECISION :- May 17, 2018
Harjit Singh ...Petitioner
Versus
State of Punjab ...Respondent
CORAM: HON'BLE MR. JUSTICE H.S. MADAAN
Present :- Mr. Sandeep Arora, Advocate for the petitioner.
Mr. C.L. Pawar, Sr. DAG, Punjab.
Learned counsel for the petitioner states that petitioner has since joined the investigation. This fact is conceded by learned State counsel on instructions from HC Inderjeet Singh. He states that the petitioner is not required for further investigation by the local police.
Under such circumstances, the interim bail granted to the petitioner on 4.4.2018 is made absolute, subject to his fulfilling conditions under Section 438(2) Cr.P.C.
The petition stands allowed accordingly.
(H.S. MADAAN) JUDGE
May 17, 2018 p.singh Whether speaking/reasoned Yes/No Whether Reportable Yes/No
Parvinder Singh 2018.05.17 16:55 I attest to the accuracy and integrity of this document Chandigarh
1 issue framed by the court
Whether the anticipatory bail granted to the petitioner should be made absolute given his participation in the investigation.
1 provisions across 1 enactments
Harjit Singh
State of Punjab
H.S. MADAAN
As recorded by the court registry
Judgements on the same questions, provisions and authorities, from every court
