The petitioner failed to appear on two consecutive dates to argue the matter. The court dismissed the petition for non-prosecution.
This page shows the compact analysis of this judgement. The full analysis — procedural history, issue-by-issue holdings with ratio and obiter, advocates, and paragraph-level evidence for every claim — is being added to the record in batches and will appear here when this judgement has been through it.
IN THE HIGH COURT OF PUNJAB AND HARYANA AT CHANDIGARH
CRM-M-11245-2015 Date of decision: - 24.01.2018
Jagsir Singh
....Petitioner
Versus
State of Punjab and others
..Respondents
CORAM : HON'BLE MR.JUSTICE MAHABIR SINGH SINDHU
Present: None for the petitioner.
Mr. Harbir Sandhu, AAG, Punjab.
Mr. K.B.S. Mann, Advocate for respondents No.2 to 4.
MAHABIR SINGH SINDHU, J. (ORAL)
On the last date also, none appeared on behalf of the
petitioner to argue the matter.
Today, case called twice, but no one is present on behalf of
the petitioner.
Dismissed for non-prosecution.
( MAHABIR SINGH SINDHU) January 24, 2018 JUDGE naresh.k Whether reportable? No Whether reasoned/speaking? No
Naresh Kumar 2018.01.25 09:14 I attest to the accuracy and integrity of this document Chandigarh
Jagsir Singh
State of Punjab
Mahabir Singh Sindhu
As recorded by the court registry
Judgements on the same questions, provisions and authorities, from every court
