The petition was dismissed for want of prosecution as the petitioner failed to appear in court despite multiple opportunities.
This page shows the compact analysis of this judgement. The full analysis — procedural history, issue-by-issue holdings with ratio and obiter, advocates, and paragraph-level evidence for every claim — is being added to the record in batches and will appear here when this judgement has been through it.
IN THE HIGH COURT OF PUNJAB AND HARYANA AT CHANDIGARH
CRM-M-11043 of 2015 Date of Decision: 04.10.2018
Surinder Pal Puri alias Surinder Puri
....Petitioner
Versus
State of Punjab and others
....Respondents
CORAM: HON'BLE MR. JUSTICE RAMENDRA JAIN
Present:None for the petitioner. Mr. Davinder Bir Singh, DAG, Punjab.
RAMENDRA JAIN, J. (ORAL)
On previous date also none had appeared on behalf of the petitioner. Even today no one has put in appearance on his behalf. Therefore, it can safely be inferred that petitioner or his counsel is no more interested in pursuing this petition.
Dismissed for want of prosecution.
(RAMENDRA JAIN) October 04, 2018 JUDGE R.S. Whether speaking/reasoned Yes/No Whether Reportable Yes/No
RAVINDER SINGH 2018.10.08 11:32 I attest to the accuracy and authenticity of this document
Surinder Pal Puri
State of Punjab
RAMENDRA JAIN
As recorded by the court registry
Judgements on the same questions, provisions and authorities, from every court
