Dismissed

Makhan Singh v. State of Punjab and Ors.

Punjab & Haryana HC22 Mar 2018CRM-M/11000/2018

Case brief

AI extract

What is this about?

A single-judge bench of Punjab and Haryana High Court in criminal miscellaneous petition directed petitioner to approach Judicial Magistrate under Section 156(3) Cr.P.C. instead of seeking interim order under Section 482 Cr.P.C. for FIR registration regarding alleged child marriage and document forgery.

What did the court decide?

The petition is disposed of by directing the petitioner to approach the Judicial Magistrate having jurisdiction under Section 156(3) Cr.P.C.

Makhan Singh Vs State of Punjab and Ors. — Cheque Dishonour | Punjab & Haryana HC (2018)

¶1

CRM-M No. 11000 of 2018 -1-

¶2

IN THE HIGH COURT OF PUNJAB & HARYANA AT CHANDIGARH

¶3

CRM-M No. 11000 of 2018 (O&M) Date of decision : 22.3.2018

¶4

Makhan Singh

¶5

................Petitioner

¶6

vs.

¶7

State of Punjab and others

¶8

.................Respondents

¶9

Coram: Hon'ble Mr. Justice H. S. Madaan

¶10

Present: Mr. Arvind Thakur, Advocate for the petitioner.

H. S. Madaan, J.

Heard.

Record perused.

By way of filing the present petition under Section 482 Cr.P.C. petitioner Makhan Singh craves for issuance of a direction to the State of Punjab through its Home Secretary, Senior Superintendent of Police, Fazilka, Station House officer, Police Station Sadar, Fazilka, District Fazilka, to register a criminal case against private respondents under Section 10/11 of the Prohibition of the Child Marriage Restraint Act, 2006 and for forging date of birth certificate, for the purpose of getting marriage registered, in that way

¶15

Banita Chugh 2018.03.26 19:35 I am the author of this document

¶16

CRM-M No. 11000 of 2018 -2-

¶17

playing fraud with various Government authorities.

¶18

Learned counsel for the petitioner has submitted that the petitioner is justified in approaching this Court by way of filing the petition, since in the terms of ratio of authority Lalita Kumari vs. Govt. of U.P. And others 2014 (1) SCC (Cri) 524, registration of FIR is mandatory under Section 154 Cr.P.C. if the information discloses commission of a cognizable offence and no preliminary enquiry is permissible in such a situation.

¶19

However, the petitioner has straightway filed the present petition in this Court without approaching the Judicial Magistrate having jurisdiction under Section 156 (3) Cr.P.C. for redressal of his grievances, in terms of ratio of the authority reported as Sakiri Vasu vs. State of U.P. And others 2008 (1) RCR (Criminal) 392 by the Apex Court. Therefore, the present petition is disposed of relegating the petitioner to the remedy of approaching the Judicial Magistrate having jurisdiction over Police Station Sadar, Fazilka, District Fazilka, under Section 156 (3) Cr.P.C.

¶20

( H.S. Madaan ) 22.3.2018 Judge chugh

¶21

Whether speaking / reasoned Yes / No

¶22

Whether reportable Yes / No

¶23

Banita Chugh 2018.03.26 19:35 I am the author of this document

Makhan Singh v. State of Punjab and Ors.

Case brief

What is this about?

What did the court decide?

Makhan Singh v. State of Punjab and Ors.

Case brief

What is this about?

What did the court decide?

What the court decided

A compact analysis

Issues for consideration

Cases cited

Statutes considered

Parties & counsel

Coram

Case details

Similar cases

Sunil @ Silla Vs State of Haryana

Darshan Singh Vs State of Punjab

Gurjit Singh and Ors. Vs State of Punjab

Diyal Singh Vs State of Punjab

Surjit Singh Vs State of Punjab & Anr.

M/S Ramdhari Virender Kumar & Anr. Vs M/S Neeraj Kumar Anil Kumar