Single judge held that a petition for pre-arrest bail by a proclaimed offender is not maintainable following the ratio of State of Madhya Pradesh vs. Pardeep Sharma.
This page shows the compact analysis of this judgement. The full analysis — procedural history, issue-by-issue holdings with ratio and obiter, advocates, and paragraph-level evidence for every claim — is being added to the record in batches and will appear here when this judgement has been through it.
IN THE HIGH COURT OF PUNJAB & HARYANA AT CHANDIGARH
CRM-M No. 10431 of 2018 (O&M) Date of decision : 13.3.2018
Sukhwinder Singh @ Kala
................Petitioner vs.
State of Punjab
.................Respondent
Coram: Hon'ble Mr. Justice H. S. Madaan
Present: Mr. A.S. Cheema, Advocate for the petitioner.
H. S. Madaan, J. (Oral)
The accused, who has been declared as a proclaimed offender is seeking pre-arrest bail. In view of the ratio of authority by the Apex Court State of Madhya Pradesh vs. Pardeep Sharma 2014 (1) RCR (Criminal) 269, the petition is not maintainable and the same is dismissed accordingly.
( H.S. Madaan ) 13.3.2018 Judge chugh
Whether speaking / reasoned Yes / No
Whether reportable Yes / No
Banita Chugh 2018.03.14 15:03 I am the author of this document
1 issue framed by the court
Whether a petition for pre-arrest bail is maintainable when the accused has been declared a proclaimed offender.
Colour shows how this judgement treated each authority
State of Madhya Pradesh vs. Pardeep SharmaApplied¶10
State of Madhya Pradesh vs. Pardeep Sharma 2014 (1) RCR (Criminal) 269
Sukhwinder Singh @ Kala
State of Punjab
H. S. Madaan
As recorded by the court registry
Judgements on the same questions, provisions and authorities, from every court
