Petitioners voluntarily withdrew Criminal Reference No. 9095 of 2017 after the Bench expressed disagreement with their submissions. The court dismissed the matter as withdrawn.
The petition was dismissed as withdrawn.
This page shows the compact analysis of this judgement. The full analysis — procedural history, issue-by-issue holdings with ratio and obiter, advocates, and paragraph-level evidence for every claim — is being added to the record in batches and will appear here when this judgement has been through it.
IN THE HIGH COURT OF PUNJAB AND HARYANA AT CHANDIGARH
CR No.9095 of 2017 Date of decision: 08.01.2018
Mahabir and another
.......Petitioners
versus
Ram Mehar and others
......Respondents
CORAM: HON'BLE MR. JUSTICE RAMENDRA JAIN
Present: - Mr. Sandeep Singh Ghangas, Advocate, for the petitioners.
RAMENDRA JAIN, J. (ORAL)
After arguing for some time, when the Bench was not agreeing with the submissions made by learned counsel for the petitioners, learned counsel prays that he may be allowed to withdraw this petition.
Dismissed as withdrawn.
(Ramendra Jain) Judge
January 08, 2018 R.S.
Whether speaking/reasoned Yes/No Whether reportable Yes/No.
Ravinder Singh 2018.01.10 11:04 I attest to the accuracy and authenticity of this document
Mahabir and another
Ram Mehar and others
RAMENDRA JAIN
As recorded by the court registry
Judgements on the same questions, provisions and authorities, from every court
