The High Court, through an oral order, granted liberty to the petitioner to withdraw the revision petition when the Court was not inclined to interfere. The matter was disposed of accordingly without a written judgment.
Liberty granted to petitioner to withdraw the revision petition.
This page shows the compact analysis of this judgement. The full analysis — procedural history, issue-by-issue holdings with ratio and obiter, advocates, and paragraph-level evidence for every claim — is being added to the record in batches and will appear here when this judgement has been through it.
CR-8834-2017 (O&M)
1
252
IN THE HIGH COURT OF PUNJAB AND HARYANA AT CHANDIGARH
CR-8834-2017 (O&M) Date of decision : 09.03.2018
Sandeep
... Petitioner(s)
Versus
Ram Naresh and others
... Respondent(s)
CORAM: HON'BLE MR. JUSTICE AMIT RAWAL
Present: Mr. Suman Jain, Advocate for the petitioner.
Mr. A.P.S. Mann, Advocate for respondent Nos.1 and 4.
Mr. Anirudh Singh, Advocate for respondent No.5.
AMIT RAWAL, J. (ORAL)
After arguing for some time, when this Court is not inclined to
interfere in the matter, learned counsel for the petitioner seeks liberty of this Court to withdraw the present revision petition.
Ordered accordingly.
( AMIT RAWAL)
09.03.2018 JUDGE
Yogesh Sharma
Whether speaking/reasoned Yes/ No
Whether Reportable
Yes/ No
Yogesh Sharma 2018.03.12 14:31 I attest to the accuracy and integrity of this document
Sandeep
Ram Naresh
Amit Rawal
As recorded by the court registry
Judgements on the same questions, provisions and authorities, from every court
