Remanded
Paramjit Kaur v. Gurmail Kaur
Punjab & Haryana HCCR/8383/2017
Case brief
from the order text
What is this about?
COURT OF PUNJAB AND HARYANA AT CHANDIGARH CR…
What the court decided
AI extract
COURT OF PUNJAB AND HARYANA AT CHANDIGARH CR…
This page shows the compact analysis of this judgement. The full analysis — procedural history, issue-by-issue holdings with ratio and obiter, advocates, and paragraph-level evidence for every claim — is being added to the record in batches and will appear here when this judgement has been through it.
IN THE HIGH COURT OF PUNJAB AND HARYANA AT CHANDIGARH
CR No.8383 of 2017 (O&M) Date of decision: 25.04.2018
Paramjit Kaur
.......Petitioner
versus
Gurmail Kaur and others
......Respondents
CORAM: HON'BLE MR. JUSTICE RAMENDRA JAIN
Present: - Dr. Rao P.S. Girwar, Advocate, for the petitioner. Ms. Gurdeep Kaur, Advocate, for respondent Gurmail Kaur.
RAMENDRA JAIN, J. (ORAL)
Through this petition under Article 227 of the Constitution of India, challenge has been laid to order dated 16.11.2017 of the trial Court, whereby application of the petitioner for additional evidence, has been rejected.
Learned counsel for the respondents submits that she has no objection in case instant petition is accepted and impugned order dated 16.11.2017 is set aside.
In view of above, impugned order dated 16.11.2017 is set aside. The trial Court is directed to afford two opportunities to the petitioner to conclude additional evidence.
Disposed of in above terms.
(Ramendra Jain) Judge
April 25, 2018 R.S.
Whether speaking/reasoned Yes/No Whether reportable Yes/No
Ravinder Singh 2018.04.27 15:44 I attest to the accuracy and authenticity of this document
2 provisions across 1 enactments
Paramjit Kaur
Gurmail Kaur
RAMENDRA JAIN
Dr. Rao P.S. Girwar
As recorded by the court registry
Judgements on the same questions, provisions and authorities, from every court