Revision filed against ejectment orders settled by parties; petitions agreed to vacate premises without execution petition in exchange for waiver of future rent/mesne profit.
Petition disposed on terms: petitioner to vacate premises by 31.03.2019 without execution petition; respondent to waive future rent/mesne profit.
This page shows the compact analysis of this judgement. The full analysis — procedural history, issue-by-issue holdings with ratio and obiter, advocates, and paragraph-level evidence for every claim — is being added to the record in batches and will appear here when this judgement has been through it.
CR-5910-2017 (O&M)
1
IN THE HIGH COURT OF PUNJAB AND HARYANA AT CHANDIGARH
108
CR-5910-2017 (O&M) Date of Decision :26.3.2018
Krishan Lal and another
....Petitioners
vs.
Parveen Kumar Jain ....Respondent
CORAM : HON'BLE MR. JUSTICE AJAY TEWARI
Present: Mr. V.K.Jindal, Senior Advocate with Mr. Gopal Soni, Advocate for the petitioners.
Mr. Harkesh Manuja, Advocate for the respondent.
AJAY TEWARI, J. (Oral)
This revision has been filed against the concurrent orders of the Courts below allowing ejectment of the petitioners-tenant from the demised premises.
After arguing form some time the matter has been settled with the intervention of the learned Senior Counsel for the petitioners and the counsel for the respondent. Today on instructions from his client the learned Senior counsel for the petitioners has stated that the petitioners will not press this petition on merits and will hand over the vacated premises voluntarily on or before 31.03.2019 without forcing the respondents to file/pressing an execution petition. In consideration for that the respondent agreed to waive off whatever amounts may be due to him on account of future rent/mesne profit/arrears subject to the condition that the petitioners files an undertaking to the above effect before the Executing Court/Trial
Anuradha 2018.03.27 11:53 I attest to the accuracy and integrity of this document
CR-5910-2017 (O&M)
2
Court on or before 2.7.2018, failing which, this revision should be deemed to be dismissed.
Learned counsel for the petitioners has accepted this condition.
In the circumstances, the revision petition is disposed of in the
above terms.
Since the main case has been decided, the pending civil miscellaneous application, if any, also stands disposed of.
| (AJAY TEWARI) | ||
|---|---|---|
| 26.3.2018 | JUDGE | |
| anuradha | ||
| Whether speaking/reasoned | - Yes/No |
|
| Whether reportable | - Yes/No |
Anuradha 2018.03.27 11:53 I attest to the accuracy and integrity of this document
1 provisions across 1 enactments
Krishan Lal and another
Parveen Kumar Jain
AJAY TEWARI
As recorded by the court registry
Judgements on the same questions, provisions and authorities, from every court
