Petitioner sought revision after underlying suit was dismissed as withdrawn. Court held no cause survived and dismissed petition as infructuous.
Revision petition dismissed as infructuous.
This page shows the compact analysis of this judgement. The full analysis — procedural history, issue-by-issue holdings with ratio and obiter, advocates, and paragraph-level evidence for every claim — is being added to the record in batches and will appear here when this judgement has been through it.
IN THE HIGH COURT FOR THE STATES OF PUNJAB AND HARYANA AT CHANDIGARH
C.R. No.5179 of 2017 Date of Decision.17.04.2018
Amar Singh
......Petitioner
Vs
Krishan Bir ........Respondent
CORAM:HON'BLE MR. JUSTICE AMIT RAWAL
Present: Mr. Prateek Pandit, Advocate for the petitioner.
-.- AMIT RAWAL J.(ORAL)
Learned counsel for the petitioner submits that the suit giving cause to the filing of the revision petition before this Court has already been dismissed as withdrawn vide order dated 7.10.2017, therefore, nothing survives for consideration in the present revision petition.
In view of the aforementioned, the revision petition is
dismissed as having infructuous.
AMIT RAWAL) JUDGE
April 17, 2018 Pankaj* Whether reasoned/speaking Yes/No Whether reportable Yes/No
PANKAJ KUMAR 2018.04.21 15:54 I attest to the accuracy and integrity of this document
Amar Singh
Krishan Bir
Amit Rawal
As recorded by the court registry
Judgements on the same questions, provisions and authorities, from every court
