A lien petition was dismissed as infructuous because the main suit was subsequently decreed in favour of the plaintiff.
This page shows the compact analysis of this judgement. The full analysis — procedural history, issue-by-issue holdings with ratio and obiter, advocates, and paragraph-level evidence for every claim — is being added to the record in batches and will appear here when this judgement has been through it.
Manoj Kumar IN THE HIGH COURT FOR THE STATES OF PUNJAB AND 2018.05.09 12:15 I attest to the accuracy and HARYANA AT CHANDIGARH integrity of this document
HARYANA AT CHANDIGARH
C.R.No.4737 of 2016
Avtar Singh Gill
...Petitioner
Versus
Harbhajan Kaur and Ors.
....Respondents
Date of Order: 07.5.2018
CORAM: HON'BLE MR. JUSTICE AMIT RAWAL
Present: Mr. Dhiraj Chawla, Advocate for the petitioner.
Mr. Nitish Garg, Advocate for respondent.
AMIT RAWAL, J (ORAL)
Learned counsel for the parties point out that the present
petition has been rendered infructuous as the main suit has since been decreed in favour of the plaintiff.
Dismissed as infructuous.
May 07, 2018 `(AMIT RAWAL) manoj JUDGE Whether speaking/reasoned: Yes/No Whether Reportable : Yes/No
Avtar Singh Gill
Harbhajan Kaur and Ors.
Amit Rawal
As recorded by the court registry
Judgements on the same questions, provisions and authorities, from every court
