The Court dismissed the petition as infructuous because the underlying suit had already been decided.
This page shows the compact analysis of this judgement. The full analysis — procedural history, issue-by-issue holdings with ratio and obiter, advocates, and paragraph-level evidence for every claim — is being added to the record in batches and will appear here when this judgement has been through it.
Manoj Kumar IN THE HIGH COURT FOR THE STATES OF PUNJAB AND 2018.04.04 11:06 I attest to the accuracy and HARYANA AT CHANDIGARH integrity of this document
CR No.1219 of 2017
Anju Bala
....Petitioner
Versus
Sushil Gupta and Ors.
....Respondents
Date of Order: 02.4.2018
CORAM: HON'BLE MR. JUSTICE AMIT RAWAL
Present: Mr. D.K. Bhatti, Advocate for the petitioner. Mr. Satish Singla, Advocate for respondent No.3.
AMIT RAWAL, J (ORAL)
Learned counsel for the petitioner submits that the present
petition has been rendered infructuous since the suit has already been decided.
Dismissed as having become infructuous.
April 02, 2018 `(AMIT RAWAL) manoj JUDGE Whether speaking/reasoned: Yes/No Whether Reportable : Yes/No
Anju Bala
Sushil Gupta and Ors.
Amit Rawal
As recorded by the court registry
Judgements on the same questions, provisions and authorities, from every court
