Dismissed

Shikha and Anr. v. Vikas Yadav & Ors.

Punjab & Haryana HC15 Mar 2018COCP/795/2018

Case brief

AI extract

What is this about?

In a contempt petition, the petitioner sought direction for realignment of a phirni violating a 2008 order. The court found the 2008 order had been recalled in 2010 and no current order mandates realignment, quashing the contempt proceedings.

What did the court decide?

Petitioner's claim for invoking contempt jurisdiction to enforce a recalled realignment order was dismissed.

Shikha and Anr. Vs Vikas Yadav & Ors. — Contempt of Court | Punjab & Haryana HC (2018)

COCP 795/2018

106

IN THE HIGH COURT OF PUNJAB & HARYANA AT CHANDIGARH

¶5

COCP 795/2018 Date of decision:15.03.2018.

¶6

Shikha and another

¶7

..............Petitioners

¶8

¶9

Vikas Yadav(Director General) and others

¶10

..............Respondents

¶11

Coram: Hon'ble Mr.Justice Jaswant Singh

¶12

Present:Mr.Randhir Singh Hooda,Advocate for the petitioners Mr.DK Mittal,Deputy Advocate General,Haryana

¶13

Jaswant Singh,J,(Oral).

¶14

Two minors represented through their next friend and natural guardian, claim themselves to be legal representatives of one Giani, who had filed CWP 17861/2006 with regard to the proposed alignment of the “phirni” leading to demolishing of his some constructed structure situated in khasra no.7//20 situated within the revenue estate of Village Berka,Tehsil Sohna, District Gurgaon.

¶15

A Division Bench of this Court vide order dated 17.12.2008 allowed the said writ petition and directed that the “phirni” earlier carved out shall run along the killa line of khasra no.7//20, meaning thereby that the “phirni” had to be realigned.

¶16

Present contempt has been filed after 9 years with the averments that the Consolidation Officers are proposing to construct the “phirni” as per earlier approved alignment by ignoring the directions contained in the order dated 17.12.2008.

¶17

Without issuing notice, Mr.D.K.Mittal,Deputy Advocate General,Haryana was directed to seek instructions from the officers concerned.

¶18

At the time of hearing today Mr.Mittal, on instructions from Dr.Naresh Kumar, the then Tehsildar has pointed out that the order dated 17.12.2008 passed by a Division Bench of this Court was recalled and the Rajinder Parshad Joshiwrit petition was ordered to be heard afresh on the application bearing CM 2018.03.16 11:22 I attest to the accuracy and integrity of this document

COCP 795/2018

106

No.1255/2010 moved by Mr.Bhagwat (respondent no.4 therein). He thereby submits that there is no fresh order setting aside the earlier proposed and sanctioned alignment of the “phirni” which runs through the line comprised in khasra no.7//20.

¶23

In response,counsel for the petitioner has tried to refer to an order dated 24.4.2015(P-6) passed by a learned single Judge of this Court directing that the order dated 17.12.2008 passed by the Division Bench was required to be enforced while dismissing CM 6907/2012 moved by one Khazan Singh for his impleadment.

¶24

This Court is not in agreement with the observations contained in the order dated 24.4.2016 as by that date the earlier order dated 17.12.2008 stood recalled by a Division Bench of this Court on 21.5.2010. Thereafter,there is no order passed passed in CWP 17861/2006 wherein there is a challenge to the previously proposed and sanctioned alignment of the “phirni” which runs through khasra no.7//20. It is further pointed out that Khazan Singh had also filed two separate writ petitions with regard to the same alignment which were dismissed by this Court on technical grounds and not on merits. The facts taken cumulatively reveal that as on date there is no subsisting order requiring realignment of the “phirni” contrary to the already sanctioned alignment. Hence there is no occasion to invoke contempt jurisdiction of this Court.

¶25

Dismissed.

¶26

15.03.2018		(J	aswant Singh)
joshi			Judge
	Whether	Yes/No
	Speaking/reasoned
	Whether Reportable	Yes/No

¶27

Rajinder Parshad Joshi 2018.03.16 11:22 I attest to the accuracy and integrity of this document

Shikha and Anr. v. Vikas Yadav & Ors.

Case brief

What is this about?

What did the court decide?

Shikha and Anr. v. Vikas Yadav & Ors.

Case brief

What is this about?

What did the court decide?

What the court decided

A compact analysis

Issues for consideration

Parties & counsel

Coram

Case details

Similar cases

Balwinder Kaur & Ors. Vs Sukhdev Singh & Ors.

Faiman Begum Vs Islam

Gopi Krishan and Ors. Vs Shobha Devi and Ors.

Renu & Ors. Vs Bijender & Ors.

Siri Ram Vs Nand Ram and Ors.

Hari Krishan @ Kuka Vs Paramjit Singh and Ors.