Dismissed
Devinder Singh v. Anurag Verma
Punjab & Haryana HCCOCP/776/2018
Case brief
from the order text
What is this about?
1 108 IN THE HIGH COURT OF PUNJAB & HARYANA…
What the court decided
AI extract
1 108 IN THE HIGH COURT OF PUNJAB & HARYANA…
This page shows the compact analysis of this judgement. The full analysis — procedural history, issue-by-issue holdings with ratio and obiter, advocates, and paragraph-level evidence for every claim — is being added to the record in batches and will appear here when this judgement has been through it.
COCP 776/2018
1
108
IN THE HIGH COURT OF PUNJAB & HARYANA AT CHANDIGARH
COCP 776/2018 Date of decision:08.03.2018.
Devinder Singh
..............Petitioner
v.
Sh.Anurag Verma,IAS
..............Respondents
Coram: Hon'ble Mr.Justice Jaswant Singh
Present:Mr.P.C.Yadav,Advocate for the petitioner
Jaswant Singh,J,(Oral).
Present contempt has been filed with the allegations that the respondent has violated the directions contained in the order dated 6.9.2017 passed by this Court in CWP 16719/2017.
It is alleged that no doubt in terms of the directions, speaking order dated 17.10.2017 has been passed, however, his claim for promotion has not been considered in terms of the directions contained in the order dated 6.9.2017.
Counsel for the petitioner has harped that his claim for promotion is not being considered, however, a perusal of the Annexure P-9 filed with CWP 16719/2017 reveals that the claim set out in the legal notice was only with regard to release of salary which has been duly addressed in the speaking order.
At this stage,counsel for the petitioner prays for permission to withdraw the petition.
Dismissed as withdrawn.
| 08.03.2018 | (Ja | swant Singh) | |
|---|---|---|---|
| joshi | Judge | ||
| Whether | Yes/No | ||
| Speaking/reasoned | |||
| Whether Reportable | Yes/No |
Rajinder Parshad Joshi 2018.03.09 09:49 I attest to the accuracy and integrity of this document
Devinder Singh
Sh. Anurag Verma, IAS
Jaswant Singh
As recorded by the court registry
Judgements on the same questions, provisions and authorities, from every court