Bimal Lochab v. Sanjeev Verma and Ors.
Case brief
What is this about?
1 107 IN THE HIGH COURT OF PUNJAB & HARYANA…
1 107 IN THE HIGH COURT OF PUNJAB & HARYANA…
This page shows the compact analysis of this judgement. The full analysis — procedural history, issue-by-issue holdings with ratio and obiter, advocates, and paragraph-level evidence for every claim — is being added to the record in batches and will appear here when this judgement has been through it.
COCP 516/2018
1
107
IN THE HIGH COURT OF PUNJAB & HARYANA AT CHANDIGARH
COCP 516/2018 Date of decision:19.03.2018.
Bimal Lochab
..............Petitioner
v.
Sh.Sanjeev Verma,Director and others
..............Respondents
Coram: Hon'ble Mr.Justice Jaswant Singh
Present:Ms.Sangita Dhanda,Advocate for the petitioner
Jaswant Singh,J,(Oral).
Petitioner is employed as an Opthalmic Assistant with the District Handicapped Welfare Center,Rohtak. He is aggrieved by the non grant of benefit of pay revision on the acceptance of the recommendations of the 7th Pay Commission as applicable to the employees of Government of Haryana.
It s claimed that respondents are in contempt in the light of general directions issued on 5.5.1999 by a Division Bench of this Court in the earlier writ petition bearing CWP 17197/1997 filed by the petitioner and other employees of the same Center.
In the opinion of this Court, it would, if at all, provide a fresh cause of action,if any.
At this stage,counsel for the petitioner seeks permission to withdraw the instant contempt petition.
Dismissed as withdrawn.
| 19.03.2018 | (Ja | swant Singh) | |
|---|---|---|---|
| joshi | Judge | ||
| Whether | Yes/No | ||
| Speaking/reasoned | |||
| Whether Reportable | Yes/No |
Rajinder Parshad Joshi 2018.03.19 17:11 I attest to the accuracy and integrity of this document
Bimal Lochab
Sh. Sanjeev Verma
Jaswant Singh
Rajinder Parshad Joshi
As recorded by the court registry
Judgements on the same questions, provisions and authorities, from every court