Single line order dismissing a writ petition as withdrawn with liberty to seek security in Zirakpur. Petitioner felt threatened upon shifting residence. Rule discharged.
Petition dismissed as withdrawn with liberty to seek security in Zirakpur; rule discharged.
This page shows the compact analysis of this judgement. The full analysis — procedural history, issue-by-issue holdings with ratio and obiter, advocates, and paragraph-level evidence for every claim — is being added to the record in batches and will appear here when this judgement has been through it.
108
IN THE HIGH COURT OF PUNJAB AND HARYANA AT CHANDIGARH
COCP-1878-2018 Date of Decision: November 22, 2018
Neelam K.Bhushan
.....Petitioner
Versus
Mrs.Nilambari Jagadale and another
......Respondents
CORAM: HON'BLE MS.JUSTICE NIRMALJIT KAUR
Present: Ms.Neha Jain, Advocate for Mr.K.S.Dadwal, Advocate for the petitioner.
Mr.Rajeev Sharma, Advocate for the respondents.
NIRMALJIT KAUR, J.
Learned counsel for the petitioner contends that the present petition has been rendered infructuous qua UT, Chandigarh but as the petitioner is still feeling threatened at Zirakpur as she is about to shift from Chandigarh to Zirakpur, therefore she may be permitted to withdraw with liberty to move an appropriate application for grant of security before the appropriate Authority there in accordance with law.
Dismissed as withdrawn with liberty aforesaid.
The rule issued to the respondents stands discharged.
| November 22, 2018 meenuss |
( NIRMALJIT KAUR ) JUDGE |
|---|---|
| 1. Whether speaking/reasoned ? |
Yes/No |
| 2. Whether reportable ? |
Yes/No |
MEENU 2018.11.26 15:34 I attest to the accuracy and authenticity of this document chandigarh
Neelam K.Bhushan
Mrs.Nilambari Jagadale
another
Nirmaljit Kaur
As recorded by the court registry
Judgements on the same questions, provisions and authorities, from every court
