Petitioner sought to withdraw the petition relying on Vitush Oberoi v. Court of its own motion. The court dismissed the petition as withdrawn.
Reservation of list case dismissed as withdrawn.
This page shows the compact analysis of this judgement. The full analysis — procedural history, issue-by-issue holdings with ratio and obiter, advocates, and paragraph-level evidence for every claim — is being added to the record in batches and will appear here when this judgement has been through it.
IN THE HIGH COURT OF PUNJAB AND HARYANA AT CHANDIGARH
COCP-1208-2017 (O & M) Date of decision: 24.05.2018
Balwant Singh Randhawa
…. Petitioner
V/s
Brij Bhushan Bansal and anr.
...Respondent(s)
CORAM: HON’BLE MR. JUSTICE RAJAN GUPTA
Present: Mr. K.S. Khehar, Advocate, for the petitioners.
Ms. Ambika Sood, DAG, Punjab.
Rajan Gupta, J. (Oral)
Learned counsel for the petitioner submits that he may be allowed to withdraw this petition in view of law laid down in Vitusah Oberoi and others versus Court of its own motion (2017) 2 SCC 314.
In view of statement made by him, this petition is dismissed as
withdrawn.
(RAJAN GUPTA) May 24, 2018 JUDGE sukhpreet Whether speaking/reasoned : Yes/No Whether reportable : Yes/No
Sukhpreet Kaur 2018.05.30 22:27 I attest to the accuracy and integrity of this document
Balwant Singh Randhawa
Brij Bhushan Bansal and anr.
Rajan Gupta
As recorded by the court registry
Judgements on the same questions, provisions and authorities, from every court
