The High Court, through a per incuriam order without reasoning, directs that the instant COCP No.1061 of 2000 be disposed of by reference to a detailed order passed in RSA No.2365 of 1992. No substantive legal question is addressed in this document.
This page shows the compact analysis of this judgement. The full analysis — procedural history, issue-by-issue holdings with ratio and obiter, advocates, and paragraph-level evidence for every claim — is being added to the record in batches and will appear here when this judgement has been through it.
IN THE HIGH COURT OF PUNJAB & HARYANA AT CHANDIGARH
COCP No.1061 of 2000 (O&M) Date of decision:23.04.2018
Shanti Devi (since deceased) through LRs ... Petitioner
Vs.
Dinesh Kumar and others
... Respondent
CORAM: HON'BLE MR. JUSTICE AMIT RAWAL
Present:None.
AMIT RAWAL J.
For order see detailed reasons recorded in a separate order passed today in RSA No.2365 of 1992 titled as “Dinesh Kumar Versus Shanti Devi (since deceased) through LRs and others”.
(AMIT RAWAL) JUDGE 23.04. 2018 savita Whether Speaking/Reasoned Yes/No Whether Reportable Yes/No
Savita 2018.04.30 14:27 I attest to the accuracy and integrity of this document High Court Chandigarh
Shanti Devi (since deceased) through LRs
Dinesh Kumar and others
AMIT RAWAL
As recorded by the court registry
Judgements on the same questions, provisions and authorities, from every court
