Allowed

Surinder Singh v. Sudesh

Punjab & Haryana HC16 Feb 2018CMM/159/2017

Case brief

AI extract

What is this about?

This bench allowed an appeal in a divorce matter and, in the same order, permitted an application for maintenance pendente lite under Section 24 of the Hindu Marriage Act. The appellant-husband was directed to pay Rs.15,000/- monthly to the respondent-wife, with deductions for any amounts already paid under Section 125 Cr.P.C. and interim litigation expenses.

What did the court decide?

Awarded maintenance pendente lite of Rs.15,000/- per month from October 2017 with deductions, and Rs.50,000/- for litigation expenses after proper adjustments.

Surinder Singh Vs Sudesh — Maintenance and Alimony | Punjab & Haryana HC (2018)

¶1

CM-3191-CII-2018 in CMM-159-2017 and FAO-M-55-2017 1

¶2

Surinder Singh Vs Smt.Sudesh

¶3

PRESENT Mr.Rajkapoor Malik, Advocate, for the appellant-husband.

¶4

Mr.Arvind Bansal, Advocate, for the respondent/wife.

¶5

CM-3191-CII-2018 is allowed.

¶6

Reply to the application under Section 24 of the Hindu Marriage Act, in the shape of affidavit of the appellant, is permitted to be taken on record.

¶7

The appellant-husband had filed a petition for divorce before the lower Court but his petition has been dismissed by the Additional District Judge, Kaithal,vide impugned judgment and decree dated 1.2.2017. Aggrieved by the said judgment, the appellant-husband has preferred the present appeal.

¶8

During pendency of the appeal, the respondent/wife has filed an application under Section 24 of the Hindu Marriage Act, claiming maintenance pendente lite at the rate of Rs.15,000/- per month besides litigation expenses claiming that she is not working whereas the appellanthusband is earning a sum of Rs.40,000/- per month being an employee of Haryana Police. It has also been averred that he owns 2½ acres of agricultural land in Village Chandana, District Kaithal, from where his income is Rs.20,000/- per month.

¶9

The appellant-husband in his reply has denied any earnings from the agricultural land but he has admitted that he is working

¶10

Raj Kumar Arora 2018.02.22 14:35 I attest to the accuracy and integrity of this document

¶11

CM-3191-CII-2018 in CMM-159-2017 and FAO-M-55-2017 2

¶12

as a Constable. Admittedly, a sum of Rs.7500/- per month was awarded to the respondent/wife in proceedings under Section 125 Cr.P.C. by the Judicial Magistrate First Class, Kaithal, as well as in the application under Section 24 of the Hindu Marriage Act before the lower Court.

¶13

A serious controversy has been raised by the counsel for

¶14

the appellant-husband regarding the income from the agricultural land.

¶15

Be that as it may, the appellant-husband cannot be absolved of his statutory liability to pay maintenance pendente lite to the applicant-respondent/wife, especially when she is incapable of earning.

¶16

On asking of the Court, it has been informed by the counsel for the appellant-husband that he is living in a joint family with his family members.

¶17

In view of above circumstances, it can be presumed that the appellant-husband, being a member of joint family, is not required to spend separately for food and shelter and the respondent/wife is entitled to maintenance pendente lite commensurate with the economic status and earning capacity of the appellant-husband. A sum of Rs.15,000/- per month is considered to be sufficient enough to enable the respondent/wife to survive and live a dignified and respectable life.

¶18

Application under Section 24 of the Hindu Marriage Act is allowed and the respondent/wife is awarded a sum of Rs.15,000/- per month as maintenance pendente lite which shall be payable from the date of application i.e. October 2017. It is made clear that any amount being paid towards maintenance in proceedings under Section 125 Cr.P.C. or any other proceedings, will be deductible from the amount of Rs.15,000/- per month

¶19

Raj Kumar Arora 2018.02.22 14:35 I attest to the accuracy and integrity of this document

¶20

CM-3191-CII-2018 in CMM-159-2017 and FAO-M-55-2017 3

¶21

awarded by this Court today. The amount if any paid will be deductible while calculating the amount due. Applicant-respondent/wife is also awarded a sum of Rs.50,000/- as litigation expenses. A sum of Rs.20,000/already paid towards interim litigation will be deductible from the amount of Rs.50,000/- awarded today.

¶22

For payment of entire arrears of maintenance pendente lite as calculated upto 31.7.2018, after adjustments as stated above, as well as balance of litigation expenses, adjourned to 13.7.2018.

¶23

(M.M.S. BEDI) JUDGE

¶24

February 16, 2018. (GURVINDER SINGH GILL) raj arora JUDGE

¶25

Raj Kumar Arora 2018.02.22 14:35 I attest to the accuracy and integrity of this document

Surinder Singh v. Sudesh

Case brief

What is this about?

What did the court decide?

Surinder Singh v. Sudesh

Case brief

What is this about?

What did the court decide?

What the court decided

A compact analysis

Issues for consideration

Statutes considered

Parties & counsel

Coram

Case details

Similar cases

Usha Vs Pardeep Kumar

Karamjit Kaur Vs Navtej Singh

Pardeep Sachdeva Vs State of Punjab and Ors.

Ravi Gupta Vs Aarti

Amit Vs Renu

Swarnjit Kaur Vs Manwinder Singh