The appellant failed to appear on the last date of hearing. The appeal was dismissed on account of non-prosecution without any substantive reasoning or application of law.
This page shows the compact analysis of this judgement. The full analysis — procedural history, issue-by-issue holdings with ratio and obiter, advocates, and paragraph-level evidence for every claim — is being added to the record in batches and will appear here when this judgement has been through it.
In the High Court of Punjab and Haryana at Chandigarh
R.S.A. No. 3971 of 2014 (O&M) Date of Decision: 09.5.2017
Nimbo and others
......Appellants
Versus
Mahipal and others
.....Respondents
CORAM: HON'BLE MRS. JUSTICE ANITA CHAUDHRY
Present: None for the appellants.
Mr. Mani Ram Verma, Advocate for respondent No. 1.
ANITA CHAUDHRY, J
There was no appearance on behalf of the appellant even on the
last date of hearing.
Dismissed for non-prosecution.
(ANITA CHAUDHRY) JUDGE
May 09, 2017 Gurpreet Whether speaking/reasoned : Yes Whether reportable : No
Gurpreet Singh Bhatia 2017.05.16 12:56 I attest to the accuracy and authenticity of this document Chandigarh
Nimbo and others
Mahipal and others
Anita Chaudhry
As recorded by the court registry
Judgements on the same questions, provisions and authorities, from every court
