The High Court of Punjab and Haryana permitted the withdrawal of an appeal with leave of the court. The appeal was subsequently dismissed as withdrawn after a dispute regarding a settlement.
Permission to withdraw the appeal granted under CM-7027-C-2017; appeal dismissed as withdrawn.
This page shows the compact analysis of this judgement. The full analysis — procedural history, issue-by-issue holdings with ratio and obiter, advocates, and paragraph-level evidence for every claim — is being added to the record in batches and will appear here when this judgement has been through it.
In the High Court of Punjab and Haryana at Chandigarh
R.S.A No. 3818 of 2012 (O&M) Date of Decision: 23.5.2017
Sunil Kumar
.....Appellant
Versus
Bal Krishan and others
......Respondents
CORAM: HON'BLE MRS. JUSTICE ANITA CHAUDHRY
Present: Mr. Govind Rana, Advocate for Mr. Harkesh Manuja, Advocate for the appellant.
Mr. Sumit Gupta, Advocate for the respondent No. 1.
ANITA CHAUDHRY, J
Counsel for the appellant states that he has the instructions to withdraw the appeal as there is a settlement.
Counsel for respondent No. 1 says that there is no settlement.
Counsel for the appellant states that he wants to withdraw the
appeal.
CM-7027-C-2017 seeking permission for withdrawal of the
appeal is allowed.
Dismissed as withdrawn.
(ANITA CHAUDHRY)
JUDGE
May 23, 2017 Gurpreet Whether speaking/reasoned : Yes Whether reportable : No
Gurpreet Singh Bhatia 2017.05.24 16:23 I attest to the accuracy and authenticity of this document Chandigarh
Sunil Kumar
Bal Krishan
Anita Chaudhry
As recorded by the court registry
Judgements on the same questions, provisions and authorities, from every court
