High Court at Chandigarh dismissed a second appeal as withdrawn by the appellant based on a compromise reached between the parties.
Main case and appeal dismissed as withdrawn; application disposed of.
This page shows the compact analysis of this judgement. The full analysis — procedural history, issue-by-issue holdings with ratio and obiter, advocates, and paragraph-level evidence for every claim — is being added to the record in batches and will appear here when this judgement has been through it.
IN THE HIGH COURT OF PUNJAB AND HARYANA AT CHANDIGARH
C.M.No.10371-C of 2017 in/and RSA No.1223 of 2006 Date of Order:28.08.2017
Raj Kumar and another
..Appellants
Versus
Gulzara Ram etc.
..Respondents
CORAM: HON'BLE MR. JUSTICE ANIL KSHETARPAL
Present: Mr. Sandeep Jain, Advocate, for the applicants-appellants.
ANIL KSHETARPAL, J (Oral)
Prayer in this application is to withdraw the regular second
appeal.
The application is supported by an affidavit. In this application, it has been stated that the parties have arrived at a compromise. The compromise, which is duly signed by the parties has been placed on the file.
In view thereof, the main case is taken up on the Board and the appeal is dismissed as withdrawn.
Application stands disposed of accordingly.
August 28, 2017 (ANIL KSHETARPAL) nt JUDGE Whether speaking/reasoned : Yes/No Whether reportable : Yes/No
Naresh Kumar 2017.08.31 15:21 I attest to the accuracy and integrity of this document Chandigarh
Raj Kumar
Gulzara Ram
Anil Kshetarpal
As recorded by the court registry
Judgements on the same questions, provisions and authorities, from every court
