In a short order, the Single Bench dismissed an appeal citing a prior High Court decision, holding no理由是 necessary for the disposal.
This page shows the compact analysis of this judgement. The full analysis — procedural history, issue-by-issue holdings with ratio and obiter, advocates, and paragraph-level evidence for every claim — is being added to the record in batches and will appear here when this judgement has been through it.
RFA-285-2000
1
IN THE HIGH COURT OF PUNJAB AND HARYANA AT CHANDIGARH
RFA-285-2000
Date of Decision: February 23, 2017
State of Haryana
...Appellant
Versus
Ram Kanwar and others
...Respondents
CORAM: HON’BLE MR. JUSTICE ARUN PALLI
Present: Mr. Shivendra Swaroop, Assistant Advocate General, Haryana, for the appellant.
ARUN PALLI, J. (ORAL)
Learned State counsel fairly submits that this appeal shall have to be dismissed in the wake of the decision rendered by this Court in the case of Haryana State v. Daya Ram and others (RFA No. 2474 of 1991, decided on 17.11.2008).
Ordered accordingly.
(ARUN PALLI) JUDGE
February 23, 2017 Pkapoor Whether Speaking/Reasoned: YES / NO Whether Reportable: YES / NO
Prashant Kapoor 2017.02.23 17:13 I attest to the accuracy and authenticity of this document
Colour shows how this judgement treated each authority
Haryana State v. Daya Ram and othersReferred¶14
Haryana State v. Daya Ram and others (RFA No. 2474 of 1991, decided on 17.11.2008)
State of Haryana
Ram Kanwar and others
Arun Palli
As recorded by the court registry
Judgements on the same questions, provisions and authorities, from every court
