Partly allowed

Shamsher Kaur and Ors. v. Surinder Kumar and Ors.

Punjab & Haryana HC2 May 2017FAO/4302/2014

Case brief

AI extract

What is this about?

Appeal against Motor Accident Claims Tribunal awards. Court enhanced compensation by allowing sum for love and affection and funeral expenses, dismissing claims for no deduction from notional income and additional future prospects.

What did the court decide?

Insurance company to pay Rs. 55,000 towards love and affection and funeral expenses from June 2014 with interest.

Shamsher Kaur and Ors. Vs Surinder Kumar and… — Motor Accident Claims | Punjab & Haryana HC (2017)

¶1

F.A.O No. 4302 of 2014

¶2

-1-

¶3

In the High Court of Punjab and Haryana at Chandigarh

¶4

F.A.O No. 4302 of 2014 Date of Decision: 02.5.2017

¶5

Shamsher Kaur @ Shero Kaur and others

¶6

......Appellants

¶7

Versus

¶8

Surinder Kumar and others .......Respondents

¶9

CORAM: HON'BLE MRS. JUSTICE ANITA CHAUDHRY

¶10

Present: Ms. Monika Jalota, Advocate for the appellants.

¶11

Mr. Suvir Dewan, Advocate for respondent No. 3.

¶12

¶13

ANITA CHAUDHRY, J

¶14

This appeal has been filed by the claimants seeking enhancement in the award dated 5.12.2013 passed by the Motor Accident Claims Tribunal, Patiala.

¶15

Gurpreet Singh a child of 17 years had died in an accident on 12.12.2011. He was the student of 10+2. The Tribunal had taken the notional income as Rs. 15,000/- and applied a cut of 1/3^rd and adopted the multiplier of 15 relying upon the case of Nirmal Maria vs. Ram Singh, 2006(1) ACJR 376 .

¶16

The submission on behalf of the appellant was that no deduction should have been made as the income was notional and no amount has been allowed for love and affection.

¶17

The submission on the other hand was that there would be no

¶18

addition when the notional income is taken as that of a child and he was not

¶19

Gurpreet Singh Bhatia 2017.05.08 16:26 I attest to the accuracy and authenticity of this document Chandigarh

¶20

F.A.O No. 4302 of 2014 -2-

¶21

earning and addition over the notional income cannot be made.

¶22

The Tribunal had wrongly made a deduction on the notional income. Therefore, the compensation would be Rs. 15,000/- x 14 taking the age of the parents into consideration. The amount would come to Rs. 2,10,000/-.

¶23

No addition towards future prospects could be made since notional income has been taken and the child was not earning. The Tribunal had allowed Rs. 75,000/- for future prospects. The amount allowed for future prospects shall be taken as compensation for love and affection. Therefore, I would allow Rs. 1,00,000/- on the head of love and affection for the mother and Rs. 25,000/- more for funeral expenses raising the total to Rs. 3,35,000/-. The Tribunal had awarded Rs. 2,80,000/- Therefore, the amount payable would be Rs. 55,000/-. The insurance company would pay a sum of Rs. 55,000/- to the claimants in the same ratio as was allowed by the Tribunal with interest @ 6% from June 2014 till realization.

¶24

The appeal is partly allowed.

¶25

(ANITA CHAUDHRY) JUDGE

¶26

May 02, 2017 Gurpreet Whether speaking/reasoned : Yes Whether reportable : No

¶27

Gurpreet Singh Bhatia 2017.05.08 16:26 I attest to the accuracy and authenticity of this document Chandigarh

Shamsher Kaur and Ors. v. Surinder Kumar and Ors.

Case brief

What is this about?

What did the court decide?

Shamsher Kaur and Ors. v. Surinder Kumar and Ors.

Case brief

What is this about?

What did the court decide?

What the court decided

A compact analysis

Issues for consideration

Cases cited

Parties & counsel

Coram

Case details

Similar cases

Murti Shivji Maharaj of Mandir Shivwala Vs Sharam Singh etc.

Dharamvir Vs Hoshiar Singh

Santosh Devi Vs Sukhbir and Ors.

Darshan Singh and Anr. Vs Nand Kishore and Ors.

Royal Sundaram Alliance Insurance Comp Ltd. Vs Kamlesh and Ors.

Satta & Anr. Vs Pohu Lal & Anr.