The High Court of Punjab and Haryana held that the appellant's appeal is dismissed as withdrawn because the parties had compromised. No substantive legal principles were enunciated.
None. Appeal dismissed as withdrawn.
This page shows the compact analysis of this judgement. The full analysis — procedural history, issue-by-issue holdings with ratio and obiter, advocates, and paragraph-level evidence for every claim — is being added to the record in batches and will appear here when this judgement has been through it.
In the High Court of Punjab and Haryana at Chandigarh
FAO No. 399 of 1991 Date of Decision: 15.5.2017
Banarsi Dass
.....Appellant
Versus
Deepak Bhatnagar and another
......Respondents
CORAM: HON'BLE MRS. JUSTICE ANITA CHAUDHRY
Present: Mr. R.S.Longia, Advocate for the appellant.
Mr. Pardeep Kumar, Advocate for the respondent No. 2.
ANITA CHAUDHRY, J
Counsel for the appellant states that the counsel who was representing the parties before the Court below has informed that the parties have compromised the matter and they do not want to pursue the matter.
Dismissed as withdrawn.
(ANITA CHAUDHRY) JUDGE
May 15, 2017 Gurpreet Whether speaking/reasoned : Yes Whether reportable : No
Gurpreet Singh Bhatia 2017.05.22 12:12 I attest to the accuracy and authenticity of this document Chandigarh
Banarsi Dass
Deepak Bhatnagar
ANITA CHAUDHRY
As recorded by the court registry
Judgements on the same questions, provisions and authorities, from every court
