Pal Singh v. State of Punjab & Others
Case brief
What is this about?
COURT FOR THE STATES OF PUNJAB AND HARYANA…
COURT FOR THE STATES OF PUNJAB AND HARYANA…
This page shows the compact analysis of this judgement. The full analysis — procedural history, issue-by-issue holdings with ratio and obiter, advocates, and paragraph-level evidence for every claim — is being added to the record in batches and will appear here when this judgement has been through it.
IN THE HIGH COURT FOR THE STATES OF PUNJAB AND HARYANA AT CHANDIGARH
CWP No.8329 of 1998 Date of Decision.24.01.2017
Pal Singh
.......Petitioner
Vs
State of Punjab and others ........Respondents
Present: Mr. Raj Kumar Garg, Advocate for the petitioner.
Mr. Yatinder Sharma, Addl. A.G., Punjab.
CORAM:HON'BLE MR. JUSTICE AMIT RAWAL
-.-
AMIT RAWAL J. (ORAL)
The challenge in the writ petition is to the order dated 25.05.1998 (Annexure P-2) whereby the post of Sarpanch for the Village Adda Hardo Jhanda was reserved for Scheduled Caste category. Since the term for the office of Sarpanch for the relevant period has already been over, nothing survives for consideration in the writ petition.
The writ petition is dismissed as having become infructuous.
(AMIT RAWAL) JUDGE January 24, 2017 Pankaj* Whether speaking/reasoned Yes/No Whether reportable Yes/No
PANKAJ KUMAR 2017.01.27 11:58 I attest to the accuracy and integrity of this document
Pal Singh
State of Punjab
Amit Rawal
As recorded by the court registry
Judgements on the same questions, provisions and authorities, from every court