The single-judge bench dismissed this 2000 Writ Petition concerning a water course order. Rejecting the challenge due to lack of stay and failure to effect service on Respondent No. 3, the Court held no cause of action survives.
Writ petition stands dismissed.
This page shows the compact analysis of this judgement. The full analysis — procedural history, issue-by-issue holdings with ratio and obiter, advocates, and paragraph-level evidence for every claim — is being added to the record in batches and will appear here when this judgement has been through it.
IN THE HIGH COURT OF PUNJAB & HARYANA AT CHANDIGARH
CWP No.7051 of 2000 Date of decision:14.02.2017
Gurtej Singh Lamberdar & another ... Petitioners
Vs.
State of Punjab and others
... Respondents
CORAM: HON'BLE MR. JUSTICE AMIT RAWAL
Present:None for the petitioners.
Mr. Yatinder Sharma, Addl.A.G.Punjab.
AMIT RAWAL J. (Oral)
This case pertains to the water course and the orders passed thereon. The writ petition is of the year 2000 and there was no stay. In my view, no cause of action survives in the present writ petition. Even otherwise, no steps have been taken to effect service upon respondent No.3.
Accordingly, writ petition stands dismissed.
(AMIT RAWAL) JUDGE February 14, 2017 savita Whether Speaking/Reasoned Yes/No Whether Reportable Yes/No
Savita 2017.02.16 10:29 I attest to the accuracy and integrity of this document High Court Chandigarh
2 issues framed by the court
Whether the writ petition survives given the lack of stay and failure to serve respondent No. 3.
Whether the petitioner's cause of action exists in the current proceedings.
Gurtej Singh Lamberdar & another
State of Punjab and others
Amit Rawal
As recorded by the court registry
Judgements on the same questions, provisions and authorities, from every court
