Single judge dismissed thisConstitutionalWrit Petition as the counsel for parties were ad idem that the controversy is governed by a prior order dated 22.08.2013 in LPA No.572 of 2010. The petition was disposed of in terms of that prior order.
This page shows the compact analysis of this judgement. The full analysis — procedural history, issue-by-issue holdings with ratio and obiter, advocates, and paragraph-level evidence for every claim — is being added to the record in batches and will appear here when this judgement has been through it.
IN THE HIGH COURT FOR THE STATES OF PUNJAB AND HARYANA AT CHANDIGARH
CWP No.2661 of 2017 Date of Decision.27.02.2017
AG Foods Limited
........Petitioner
Vs
State of Punjab and others
........Respondents
Present: Mr. Arvind Kashyap, Advocate for the petitioner.
Mr. Yatinder Sharma, Addl. A.G., Punjab.
CORAM:HON'BLE MR. JUSTICE AMIT RAWAL
-.-
AMIT RAWAL J. (ORAL)
Both the learned counsel for the parties are ad idem that controversy involved in the present writ petition is covered by the order dated 22.08.2013 passed in LPA No.572 of 2010 titled as “The State of Punjab and others vs. M/s Ferozshah Agro Pvt. Ltd., village Missri, Tehsil and District Ferozepur”.
In view of the aforementioned, the present writ petition is disposed of in terms of order dated 22.08.2013 passed in LPA No.572 of 2010 titled as The State of Punjab and others vs. M/s Ferozshah Agro Pvt. Ltd., village Missri, Tehsil and District Ferozepur.
(AMIT RAWAL) JUDGE
February 27, 2017 Pankaj*
Whether speaking/reasoned order Yes/No Whether reportable Yes/No
PANKAJ KUMAR 2017.03.01 10:56 I attest to the accuracy and integrity of this document
Colour shows how this judgement treated each authority
The State of Punjab and others vs. M/s Ferozshah Agro Pvt. Ltd.Followed¶13
LPA No.572 of 2010
AG Foods Limited
State of Punjab
Amit Rawal
As recorded by the court registry
Judgements on the same questions, provisions and authorities, from every court
