of 2016 (O&M) -1- IN THE HIGH COURT FOR THE…
Application allowed; annexures P-8 and P-9 taken on record. WP disposed of with an observation to amend the suit to assail the challenged order.
This page shows the compact analysis of this judgement. The full analysis — procedural history, issue-by-issue holdings with ratio and obiter, advocates, and paragraph-level evidence for every claim — is being added to the record in batches and will appear here when this judgement has been through it.
CWP No.24360 of 2016 (O&M)
-1-
IN THE HIGH COURT FOR THE STATES OF PUNJAB AND HARYANA AT CHANDIGARH
CWP No.24360 of 2016 (O&M) Date of Decision.06.02.2017
All India Eye Relief Society (regd) ........Petitioner
Vs Financial Commissioner Punjab and others ........Respondents Present: Mr. Vikas Singh, Advocate for the petitioner.
CORAM:HON'BLE MR. JUSTICE AMIT RAWAL
-.-
AMIT RAWAL J. (ORAL)
C.M. No.1623 of 2017
Application is allowed.
Annexures P-8 and P-9 are taken on record subject to all just
exceptions.
CWP No.24360 of 2016
The grievance of the petitioner in the present writ petition is with regard to the mutation of the property on the basis of the High Court order.
Learned counsel for the petitioner submits that the petitioner has already availed the remedy of suit viz-a-viz the mutation though the suit is of the year 2001. The order under challenge is subsequent of the same, thus, challenged under Article 226 of the Constitution.
Since the issue under challenge is disputed question of fact with regard to having acquired right by virtue of alleged gift deed by the Gram Panchayat, I deem it appropriate that the petitioner should seek amendment of the suit, being a subsequent event and assail the order PANKAJ KUMAR 2017.02.08 11:40 challenged herein in the suit. In case any application for amendment is I attest to the accuracy and integrity of this document
CWP No.24360 of 2016 (O&M)
-2-
filed, the trial Court shall decide the same in a most pragmatic manner keeping in view the subsequent event having taken place during the pendency of the suit.
With the aforementioned observations, the writ petition stands
disposed of.
(AMIT RAWAL) JUDGE
February 06, 2017 Pankaj*
Whether speaking/reasoned Yes Whether reportable No
PANKAJ KUMAR 2017.02.08 11:40 I attest to the accuracy and integrity of this document
All India Eye Relief Society (regd)
Financial Commissioner Punjab
Amit Rawal
As recorded by the court registry
Judgements on the same questions, provisions and authorities, from every court
