petitioner submits that the aforementioned representation was based on the premise that the Government, vide memo dated 19.03.1982, had decided to accommodate the members of 40 Harijan families who are likely to be ousted from the land allotted for the open jail. The proposal dated 23.01.1990 (Annexure P-3) was also prepared in which the name of petitioner was figuring at serial no.21. According to the aforesaid proposal, the petitioner was found eligible for land measuring 10 kanals, since he was found in possession of the aforesaid land since 1980 as per khasra girdawari. The petitioner approached this Court, vide CWP No.2117 of 1992 seeking allotment as per policy. The same was disposed of by this Court along with CWP No.1313 of 1990, vide order dated 06.05.2010 granting liberty to the petitioner to make a fresh representation. In this background of the matter, the representation dated 02.06.2010 was submitted before the Deputy Commissioner-cum-Collector (Civil), Kapurthala but the same remained undecided, which constrained the petitioner to again approach this Court for seeking vindication of his grievance, vide CWP No.7361 of 2011 and the same was disposed of vide order dated 28.04.2011 by directing respondent No.2 to take decision on the representation of the petitioner dated 02.06.2010 in accordance with law. He further submits that the impugned order suffers from illegality, perversity, much less is not backed by reasons, much less cogent reasons and in this regard, has drawn the attention of this Court to the proposal (Annexure P-3), which has not been taken into consideration. The order is most sketchy and mechanical.
